I can no longer bear to watch the news. MSNBC was once my morning companion and my evening lament, my spirit and my sorrow. But now, the constant moaning is unbearable. It is the moaning of those who love democracy and those who fear persecution. I hear the sighing of the kindhearted and the open-minded. Who can be deaf to the yearning of the immigrant’s child and the peacemaker? And I can’t help but wonder: what is God’s reaction to this moaning?

When Israel was in Egypt—enslaved and oppressed, barely able to voice their agony—God heard them.

וְגַ֣ם ׀ אֲנִ֣י שָׁמַ֗עְתִּי אֶֽת־נַאֲקַת֙ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֲשֶׁ֥ר מִצְרַ֖יִם מַעֲבִדִ֣ים אֹתָ֑ם וָאֶזְכֹּ֖ר אֶת־בְּרִיתִֽי׃
“I have now heard the moaning of the Israelites because the Egyptians are holding them in bondage, and I have remembered My covenant.”
Exodus 6:5

Millenia later, I wonder if God hears the woeful cries, awaiting God’s mercy. Without divine intervention, the responsibility to repair the world is ours alone. We learned from the sages that the task of repairing the world is great and we cannot desist from the work. It is upon us.

During the Shoah, as the Nazis systematically annihilated Europe’s Jews, our people moaned, cried, begged, and prayed. They had no arsenals, no munitions, no means of defense. And still, God did not seem to remember the covenant.

In 2024, a barbaric assault by Hamas echoed those horrors of the Shoah. Within hours, the terrorists slaughtered hundreds of young people at a music festival and desecrated bodies. The hostages moan in captivity while their families plead for release. As Hamas held Israelis and Americans in Gaza, enslaved and oppressed, suffocating in dark tunnels, how could God just listen to their pleas?

The Israeli response to the attack was swift and devastating. This time, an emphatic and unyielding “Never Again,” overshadowed the imperative to repair the world. The slogan “Never again” transformed yearning for peace into a cry of war. With tanks, planes, and bombs at its disposal, the Israeli army acted in response to the moaning of its people. But where was God? Was God crouched in the tunnels with the hostages? Was God fighting among the soldiers?

On January 15, 2025, we learned of a deal for Hamas to release thirty three more hostages. Israel will release 1,830 Palestinians in exchange. The ordeal of these hostages in Gaza has spanned 470 days, leaving a nation traumatized.

That same day, reports emerged of thousands more Palestinians in Gaza dead than previously acknowledged. Whether the number is 40,000 or 70,000, too many died. Each was a descendant of Abraham’s son Ishmael and their humanity should not be lost in the calculus of war. The sons and daughters of Isaac and Jacob were attacked, and in return, unleashed their fury. And I wonder if God heard any other moans—those buried under rubble, those fleeing destruction, those clinging to life, wherever they may be . . . in Gaza, in Sudan, or in Ukraine.

In the aftermath of Hamas’ attack, Israel’s leaders found justification and an imperative for their actions. Perhaps the horrific Hamas attack helped rationalize a greater, more brutal response. Israel’s leaders ignored the wisdom and caution of Western leaders, instead declaring, “Enough!” Jews learn from Exodus 22:1, “If someone comes to kill you, hurry to kill them first”. Formed of that same moral urgency, Israel used cutting-edge technology and crude weaponry to set back Iran, decimate Hezbollah, and destabilize the Assad regime in Syria. These actions helped to prevent future attacks on Israel.

And yet, with the release of thirty three more Israelis, I still hear the moans of the remaining captives, the cries of the mourners, the wails of the injured all unleashed by Hamas, and extended by a desperate Israeli government.

I seek solace, but only accumulate unanswered questions. How could Israel endure such a ferocious attack on October 7? What nation could tolerate such barbarity? And how could Israel, in turn, unleash so much destruction, killing neighbors— descendants of Abraham, children of Ishmael?

Psalm 71 begins:
I seek refuge in You, O LORD;
may I never be disappointed.
As You are beneficent, save me and rescue me;
incline Your ear to me and deliver me.

God, are You listening?  I’m seeking refuge and remain disappointed. Humans are not nearly as beneficent as You. Did You did not deliver the Hebrews from their bondage, their misery? Whose moans do you hear? God, are You watching CNN—or even Fox News? Can you watch for me, because I can’t bear to listen anymore! I read in the Torah that You can hear and respond. Will You, now?

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

וַיָּ֥קׇם מֶֽלֶךְ־חָדָ֖שׁ עַל־מִצְרָ֑יִם אֲשֶׁ֥ר לֹֽא־יָדַ֖ע אֶת־יוֹסֵֽף׃

A new king arose over Egypt who did not know Joseph.

Shabbat, January 18, falls just two days before the inauguration of our next and returning President. That day, we read, “A new king arose over Egypt who did not know Joseph.” Amid the many stressors in my life, I reflect on the future of our nation and planet as we approach January 20. My greatest concern is uncertainty: I do not know what our new leader knows. I fear that he does not know Joseph.

At the close of Genesis, we learn about Joseph’s extraordinary character. Joseph was honest, interpreting dreams with integrity and foresight. He was visionary, discerning from Pharaoh’s dreams a plan to safeguard Egypt’s future. Joseph demonstrated adaptability, embracing a new identity and role within Egyptian society.

Most importantly, Joseph knew how to forgive. His brothers, who sold him into slavery, were later welcomed by Joseph into Egypt. Despite initial hesitation, Joseph reconciled with them, offering a model of healing and unity.

Now I worry that our next and returning President may not know Joseph. To know Joseph is to appreciate the lessons of the past and build upon them. To know Joseph is to honor ancestors and extend a hand to adversaries. Knowing Joseph means striving for peace and prosperity for the nation and the world.

By amazing or perhaps Godly coincidence, January 20 is also our national celebration of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s birthday. Reflecting on King’s life, I find him to be “King” who knew Joseph – demonstrated by his humanity, his vision, and his willingness to reconcile with people who refashioned and continued the legacy of enslavement.

The Book of Exodus begins with ancestors and concludes with liberation. Between these bookends, we encounter bondage and tribulation. Yet, the journey ultimately brings the Israelites to Sinai—a place of law, Divine presence, and the beginning of the path home. Though the challenges were immense and the timeline long, the Jewish story teaches us to hold onto hope, to be strong, and to remember Joseph. And on January 20, let’s also focus on expanding the legacy of the King, of civil and human rights.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

I grew up watching my parents’ unwavering devotion to my grandparents, especially as they aged. Their dedication became the gold standard for care in my mind. When Grandma Sarah was hospitalized at Lenox Hill for two months, my mother commuted daily from Long Island to New York City on the railroad. It’s no wonder I felt guilty going to Florida to celebrate New Year’s while my mother remained in rehab. I doubted that the caring was sufficient given the long distance. And so, I wonder: how will my children care for me if I am elderly and in ill health?

The Torah offers inspiration in its depiction of Joseph’s devotion to his father, Jacob. As Jacob’s health declined, Joseph rushed to his bedside, bringing his sons with him. Jacob embraced his grandsons and gave them a profound blessing:

הַמַּלְאָךְ֩ הַגֹּאֵ֨ל אֹתִ֜י מִכׇּל־רָ֗ע יְבָרֵךְ֮ אֶת־הַנְּעָרִים֒ וְיִקָּרֵ֤א בָהֶם֙ שְׁמִ֔י וְשֵׁ֥ם אֲבֹתַ֖י אַבְרָהָ֣ם וְיִצְחָ֑ק וְיִדְגּ֥וּ לָרֹ֖ב בְּקֶ֥רֶב הָאָֽרֶץ׃

“The Angel who has redeemed me from all harm—
Bless the lads.
In them may my name be recalled,
And the names of my fathers, Abraham and Isaac,
And may they be teeming multitudes upon the earth.” Genesis 48

Jacob’s blessing is both realistic and timeless. He acknowledges life’s inevitable challenges and offers a blessing generated by a wish for redemption from harm. At the same time, he creates a profound connection across generations, invoking the memory of ancestors while anticipating the legacy of future descendants. Joseph, for his part, ensures his father’s blessing remains vital to his family’s story.

Fast forward to 2024. A dear friend with a debilitating but short-lived illness shared her pain at the lack of daily check-ins from her children, who offered little more than occasional texts and phone calls. Another friend confided that the geographic and emotional distance between them and their adult children feels impossible to bridge.

New standards shape modern parent-child relationships. We encourage our children to pursue happiness wherever it takes them, emphasizing autonomy and individuality. “Don’t guilt your children into meeting your expectations,” we are told.

At the same time, we plan for the consequences of these growing distances. We buy long-term care insurance, knowing we might lack family to support us in our old age. We modify our homes to ensure they are accessible, preparing to age in place. Independent senior living facilities are thriving businesses, driven by the idealized reality that living longer self-reliantly often means living alone but with greater needs.

The statistics speak for themselves: the population of people over 90 is growing rapidly. Yet longevity demands more support—medical care is increasingly complex and impersonal. If hospitalized, you need an advocate. If mobility declines, you need an aide. Moving in with family or depending on children and grandchildren for care feels increasingly uncommon.

Even as I write this, I hesitate to admit these thoughts aloud. Perhaps it feels selfish to wonder what I can expect from my children as I grow older. Yet the question lingers: are we truly preparing our families for a future where care and connection go hand in hand? Or are we quietly accepting a world where independence triumphs and the bonds between generations grow fragile?

The answers may not come easily, but the questions demand that we reflect—not only on how we care for our parents but on the legacy of care and connection we hope to leave behind for our children.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

Christmas coinciding with the first night of Hanukkah might suggest a joyous day. Yet, for me, it unfolded differently. I spent hours with my mother in her rehab room and another hour guiding a friend whose father had entered hospice care after slipping into unconsciousness in a Florida hospital.

I don’t feel cheated out of the celebration. Instead, I am frustrated by how medical providers often handle end-of-life issues.

This week’s Torah portion inspired reflection on how we guide our elders through illness, pain, and depression. Jacob, having mourned his son Joseph for decades, learned Joseph is alive. Jacob prepared to journey to Egypt. God spoke to him, saying:

“I am God, the God of your father’s house. Fear not to go down to Egypt, for I will make you there into a great nation. I Myself will go down with you to Egypt, and I Myself will also bring you back; and Joseph’s hand shall close your eyes.” (Genesis 46:3-4)

Later, Jacob meets Pharaoh, who asks his age. Jacob responds:

“The years of my sojourn [on earth] are one hundred and thirty. Few and hard have been the years of my life, nor do they come up to the lifespans of my ancestors during their sojourns.” (Genesis 47:9)

The contrast between these two conversations is striking. God offers comfort and reassurance to Jacob in his old age. God acknowledges Jacob’s demise is imminent. Pharaoh, by contrast, asks a technical question, devoid of depth or empathy. Pharaoh focuses on the past.

This contrast speaks volumes about how we should approach the elderly. God’s words provide a model for offering presence and understanding, while Pharaoh’s response underscores the failure to engage meaningfully with an elder at the end of life.

The bestseller Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity by Peter Attia explores the science of living longer and healthier. Attia critiques modern medicine’s focus on treating illness rather than fostering health. Similarly, I’ve observed how many medical professionals, trained to heal, often struggle to simply be present with a patient grappling with the inevitability of life’s end.

I witnessed this firsthand with my mother. She was in great pain when a nurse entered her room and asked, “How are you feeling?” My mother replied, “I want to die.” The nurse responded, “But you are so beautiful,” a comment so disconnected that it left me bemused.

The next day, her doctor asked the same question, receiving the same response: “I want to die.” This time, the doctor replied, “Don’t you want to live for your children and grandchildren?” It was the first time I had heard a doctor use guilt on a Jewish mother as a tool for healing.

I don’t mean to condemn all medical professionals. I am entirely grateful for every act of kindness, thoughtfulness, and healing delivered consistently by the staff and doctors. My dismay was how the skill set of healing was overshadowed when the conversation turned to death.

Seeking a more compassionate response, I called a rabbi experienced in end-of-life care. When Rabbi Rose visited, he listened deeply to mom’s words, understanding her statement as a plea for acknowledgment—not an abstract cry for help, but a need to have her pain and grief seen.

She didn’t need platitudes about her beauty or obligations to others. She needed the kind of presence God offered Jacob. Mom, I’m with you, and I’ll be with you until you can no longer open your eyes.

Similarly, when my friend’s father was “actively dying,” I contacted a rabbi to visit their family. I knew that this family needed presence, reassurance, and compassion—something I wasn’t sure the hospital staff, even on Christmas Day, could provide.

This season brought no miracles. Oxycodone and morphine eased physical pain, but true solace came from Jewish tradition, the Torah, and the wisdom of our Rabbis. They remind us how to be present when life nears its end—with presence and compassion.

Captive in an Egyptian prison, Joseph’s ability to interpret dreams became the key to his freedom. What dreams did Joseph have during those long, uncertain years of captivity? Will dreams sustain those held in chains of oppression or illness today?

וַיְהִ֕י מִקֵּ֖ץ שְׁנָתַ֣יִם יָמִ֑ים וּפַרְעֹ֣ה חֹלֵ֔ם וְהִנֵּ֖ה עֹמֵ֥ד עַל־הַיְאֹֽר׃

Parshat Miketz begins; “After two years, Pharaoh dreamed he was standing by the Nile.”

Joseph interpreted Pharaoh’s dreams, predicting seven years of abundance followed by seven years of famine. Impressed by his wisdom, Pharaoh elevated Joseph to a high position, entrusting him to oversee a plan that would save Egypt. Remarkably, Pharaoh placed his faith in an enslaved Hebrew with nothing more than a reputation for understanding dreams.

While Joseph rose to prominence, we must not forget the years he spent languishing in prison. The Torah notes that God was with Joseph during this time, yet the pain of his incarceration cannot be overlooked. What dreams sustained him? How did God bring him comfort in his darkest moments? The text raises unanswered questions about Joseph’s mental and emotional state—questions that resonate even today.

This episode brings to my mind two thoughts. The first is of the 100 or more captives currently held in Gaza. What dreams sustain them in their captivity? What comfort do they cling to? I think of the unimaginable mental health challenges they endure—loneliness, claustrophobia, anxiety, degredation, and heartbreak. What will it take to secure their release? What skills, actions, and faith must we muster?

This reflection extends beyond physical captivity. Many today feel imprisoned by illness, disability, or the limitations of aging. These challenges have been a focus of my life’s work. And now, my own mother is facing physical incapacity and has no hope of full recovery and relies on oxycodone for comfort. For people facing these struggles, life can resemble captivity. What dreams give them hope? What comfort best helps them persevere? When might they just give up?

If empathy for the imprisoned still feels distant, consider this: You, too, might face some form of captivity in your lifetime—whether it’s short-lived or prolonged. (Remember the Covid epidemic?) It might come in the form of illness, loss of freedom, or confinement to a circumstance beyond your control. To prepare for that moment, you can begin by advocating for those already captive—whether they are prisoners of terror, illness, or circumstance. Concrete actions that demonstrate your concern send a powerful message to the world: This is how we wish to be treated in our own moments of vulnerability. We care about each person held captive, whatever the nature of the prison. Advocate for patients’ rights, prison reform, or rail against the laggard Government of Israel what has not follow the Torah that demands we prioritize the safe return of captives.

What will your dreams be if you ever lose freedom of movement or choice? Now is the time to dream boldly about the world you value most and take action to secure those rights—not just for yourself, but for everyone around you.

The story of Joseph offers a dramatic arc: a young man thrown into a pit, held in prison, and ultimately elevated to the heights of Egyptian power. Its happy ending lifts us up. But today, I find myself grappling with endings that feel far from happy. I wrestle with the reality of imprisonment—whether it’s within a prison cell or within the confines of our imperfect bodies.

Without the certainty that God will bring me comfort or that a fairy-tale ending awaits, I turn to you. I seek solidarity, I invite action, and I dream of a day when all forms of captivity will dissolve—like a bad dream finally giving way to the morning light.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

I needed a guide for navigating difficult conversations. Comforting the grieving and ill is a mitzvah, but we have to be careful what we say to be helpful and not harmful. I thought of this analogy. We should be like a bowl of chicken soup: warm, nourishing, simple, made with love, and leaving room for more. Here’s what triggered my thinking on this topic.

What Not to Say: Lessons from Joseph’s Story

In the Torah, Joseph’s brothers sell him into slavery and then cover up their actions. They bring his bloodstained tunic to their father, saying:

“We found this. Please examine it; is it your son’s tunic or not?”

No assumption of fault and nearly no compassion can be found in their approach. The share bad news in the form of a question, a construct that places distance between those asking and those answering.  Why then would they ask their father to confirm what they already knew? Did they hope to soften the blow or avoid culpability? Either way, it’s an example of an abrupt and dishonest way to deliver bad news. And then,

Notice that only Jacob mourned for Joseph. No wonder he refused to be comforted by his sons and daughters, who did not actually mourn with him. They could not approach his grief and could not offer comfort.

From my own experiences—countless hospital visits and shiva calls —I’ve learned how to approach difficult moments thoughtfully. The key is to say little as described in Proverbs 18:27-28,

A knowledgeable person is sparing with his words;
A person of understanding is reticent.

Even a fool, if keeping silent, is deemed wise;
Intelligent, if he/she seals their lips.

14 Guidelines for Delivering Bad News

  1. Be direct. Don’t avoid the issue with euphemisms and platitudes. Say, “X is sick” or “Y has died.”
  2. Avoid empty questions. Instead of “How are you doing?”—which can feel trite and unanswerable — just acknowledge the reality (i.e. “this sucks”)
  3. Keep it simple. Jewish tradition gets it right: say little. Try something that acknowledges pain like: “what a blow,” or “This is so hard”.
  4. Don’t dig for details. Avoid questions about how or why the tragedy occurred. Focus on listening not playing detective.
  5. Skip immediate offers to help. Presence is more valuable than problem-solving at first.
  6. Hold off on logistics. Tasks like notifying others or organizing food can wait for an hour or two.
  7. Trust the medical team. Avoid questioning the medical care right away. It can stir doubts or guilt.
  8. Avoid distressing stories. Don’t share your anecdotes about painful experiences. It adds fear, not comfort.
  9. Be practical. Coordinate a meal train or a schedule of visitors without involving the grieving person.
  10. Keep your emotions in check. Don’t add your concerns or dread to their burden.
  11. Respect boundaries. Physical touch is not always welcome. Perhaps you can offer merely to hold a hand before initiating big physical touch like a hug.
  12. Plan for follow-ups. Say, “I’ll call on Thursday. You don’t have to answer but I’ll be available,” or “I’ll bake your favorite cookies. And keep them in the freezer.” Concrete and tangible actions matter when offered without obligation.
  13. Allow time. Grieving and healing can’t be rushed. Your continued presence over time is the best gift.
  14. Leave with assurance. End on a note of continued care and support. There is brilliance in the traditional phrase: “HaMakom Yinachem” – may you find comfort among all who grieve” It acknowledges their pain, and that they are not alone.

A Better Way to Care

Joseph’s brothers set a low bar for delivering bad news and comforting their father. We can do better when coming into the presence of someone who is coping with a crisis. Show up with a full heart, but not a full mouth. Speak less, listen more, and let your actions show your love.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

When getting a haircut recently, I shared my stress about the current state of our country, especially the radical elements. Post-election, the news has me worrying about my family’s well-being. Between snips, my stylist advised me to tune out the distressing headlines. “Just ignore it,” he said with a dismissive shrug. But his advice struck me as misguided. Ignoring the threatening elements of our nation feels dangerous, especially for vulnerable communities; Jews, Trans people, Blacks, and others. Willful ignorance enables hatred and emboldens vigilantes. Rather than withdraw, I want to face these anxieties with a plan.

This brings to mind a story from the Torah. When Jacob returns to Canaan after years away, he knows he must face his brother Esau, who once threatened to kill him. Jacob is understandably consumed by fear and anxiety: “Jacob was very afraid and distressed” (וַיִירָא יֲעֲקֹב מְאָד וַיֵצֶר לֹוֹ).

But Jacob does not allow his fear to paralyze him. Instead, he devises a plan. He divides his family, flocks, and herds into two camps, reasoning that if Esau attacks one, the other might escape. Later that evening, alone and wrestling with an angel, Jacob emerges from the encounter transformed, though he carries a limp as a reminder of the struggle.

The reunion between Jacob and Esau unfolds surprisingly peacefully. Esau embraces Jacob, seemingly letting go of his anger. Yet Jacob remains cautious, politely declining Esau’s invitation to live together and instead choosing a separate path. Though Esau’s intentions appear genuine, Jacob’s anxiety persists—a testament to how fear, whether real or imagined, shapes our perceptions and decisions.

Jacob’s story resonates deeply in today’s climate. His fear of Esau, rooted in past threats, mirrors the psychological insecurity many of us feel in uncertain times. For me, this insecurity stems from doubts about the dependability of my fellow “radicalized” Americans. Remember the shooting at the Tree of Life in Pittsburgh or the demonstrations in Charlottesville or the encampment at Columbia University? History reminds us to stay vigilant. Anti-Semitism has long existed in this country, and while we have not experienced something as catastrophic as Kristallnacht, recent surges in hate crimes and extremist rhetoric are alarming.

In times of heightened tension, comfort and security come from preparedness. Jacob’s response to his fear is instructive: he acknowledges his anxiety, devises a strategy, and takes steps to protect his family and resources. Ignoring one’s fears—as my stylist suggested—is not a viable solution for building safety or resilience.

Some may dismiss such caution as overreaction. After all, our nation has weathered storms of division before. Yet, insecurity is not purely rational; it’s an emotional response informed by history and the temperature of the times. For those of us in vulnerable communities, the stakes feel too high to simply “tune out” and hope for the best.

Like Jacob, I grapple with how to balance engagement with self-preservation. I want to be a cordial neighbor while maintaining vigilance and boundaries. For some, this might mean considering extreme measures like moving assets abroad or seeking refuge in another country. Others may find solace in local community-building or advocacy work. That is where I devote my energies. The paths vary, but the need for a plan remains constant.

Jacob’s story reminds us that fear can constrict our sense of judgment but also sharpen our instincts. His example encourages us to channel our anxieties into thoughtful preparation. In the face of uncertainty, we are called to protect what we value most while striving to create conditions for a safer, more equitable future.

Evan J. Krame, Rabbi

וַיִּשַּׁ֥ק יַעֲקֹ֖ב לְרָחֵ֑ל וַיִּשָּׂ֥א אֶת־קֹל֖וֹ וַיֵּֽבְךְּ׃
Then Jacob kissed Rachel and broke into tears.

The story of Jacob kissing Rachel at the well is a tale of divine destiny and human connection. However, viewed through the lens of modern sensibilities, this moment can provoke complex reactions, especially in an era of extreme polarization.

Jacob fled his home after deceiving his brother, Esau, and sought refuge with family in the east. Happening upon his cousin Rachel at a well for watering the herds, he kissed her. Today acts like touching, fondling, or kissing without explicit permission are classified as sexual assault—serious offenses with traumatic consequences. For many, Jacob’s impulsive act might appear as an unacceptable breach of personal boundaries. And yet, when read as part of a sacred text, Jacob’s kiss transcends its literal act, embodying deeper spiritual symbolism. Mystics interpret the gesture as a merging of divine masculine and feminine energies, a sacred channeling of cosmic balance.

Still, acknowledging the spiritual lens doesn’t negate the unease such actions might evoke in a contemporary reader. The challenge of our time lies in holding space for alternative interpretations without succumbing to righteousness or judgment.

Had this scene unfolded in today’s media-saturated environment, it’s not hard to imagine the outrage. Remember the Royal Spanish Football Federation President Luis Rubiales? He placed an unwanted kiss on the lips of the gold medal winning soccer team’s star. Rubiales faced widespread criticism for the incident, labeling his behavior “unacceptable” and “simply disgusting,” and calls for him to stand trial.

Were Jacob a modern day personality, social media platforms would erupt with criticism, news outlets would amplify competing narratives, and public figures would be compelled to take sides. The progressive left, committed to ideals of justice and consent, might decry Jacob’s actions, interpreting them as emblematic of male entitlement and patriarchal norms. At the same time, others might dismiss the backlash as overreach, defending the kiss as an innocent, even celebratory, act.

These dynamics echo broader societal debates. The terms “cancel culture,” “virtue signaling,” and “political correctness” are often wielded as critiques of progressive efforts to hold individuals accountable. But beneath these monikers lie genuine aspirations for a fairer and more just world. The friction arises when accountability becomes politicized, conversations grow polarized, and elections are at stake.

Fundamentalists and literalists might argue that the Bible implicitly endorses Jacob’s behavior, framing it within the norms of its time. Others may view the tears that followed the kiss as evidence of its spiritual purity—a moment of divine inspiration rather than human transgression. Still, some will find such arguments insufficient, especially when read alongside modern understandings of consent and trauma.

The recent cultural shifts in America reflect these tensions. Progressives, reeling from electoral losses and societal pushback, often find themselves caught between defending their ideals and grappling with accusations of alienating rhetoric. Critics argue that the left’s insistence on moral absolutes has estranged potential allies, while others suggest that the progressive movement’s ethical clarity is precisely its strength.

So, how do we reconcile these perspectives? Perhaps the key lies in embracing complexity. The story of Jacob and Rachel invites us to read beyond the literal, to hold the text’s spiritual richness alongside our contemporary values. It challenges us to ask: Can we engage with our foundational narratives in a way that honors both their historical context and our evolving ethical standards?

America’s recent political landscape offers a similar challenge. Righteousness alone may not win elections but abandoning core principles for the sake of expedience risks undermining the very ideals that define a movement. The balance lies in finding a prophetic voice that is both compelling and accessible, a voice that can inspire without alienating.

Jacob’s kiss at the well, like many biblical moments, resists simple categorization. It is at once a deeply personal act and a symbol of something far greater. By wrestling with its meaning, we not only deepen our understanding of the text but also of ourselves—and the societies we aspire to build.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

Molly Ivins famously observed, “The first rule of holes is, when you’re in one, stop digging.” Thomas Friedman added, “When you’re in three, bring a lot of shovels.” Reflecting on the story of Isaac in Genesis, I’m inclined to think Friedman was channeling the Torah.

Isaac faced adversarial neighbors who sought to undermine his survival. The Philistines stopped up the wells that his father, Abraham, had dug. In a harsh, arid landscape, obstructing a water source isn’t just an inconvenience; it’s an existential threat.

“Isaac dug anew the wells which had been dug in the days of his father Abraham and which the Philistines had stopped up after Abraham’s death, and he gave them the same names that his father had given them.” (Genesis 26:18)

Isaac’s actions were not about innovation but continuity. He wasn’t trying to build something new; he was restoring what had been lost. By redigging the wells, Isaac extended his father’s legacy and sustained his family and community.

In the Torah, wells represent more than just a source of water—they symbolize connection and gathering. Rebecca met Abraham’s servant at a well, Tzipporah encountered Moses at a well, and throughout Jewish tradition, wells are places of critical encounters and shared purpose.

Today, Isaac’s determination to reopen his father’s wells challenges us to reflect on the legacies we want to protect. Many of these legacies are at risk:

The legacy of Jewish comfort in America is being stopped up by rising anti-Semitism.
Doubts about our voting systems are threatening the foundation of our democracy.
Caring communities are dissolving as we retreat into online shopping, social media trolling, and TikTok distraction.

Isaac teaches us that there is a time for innovation and a time for restoration. Reopening the wells of our fathers—those symbolic fonts of civility, freedom, and connection—has never been more vital. Without them, the sources that sustain our society may collapse under the weight of discord, subjugation, and disconnection.

I offer an example.  I have devoted myself to fostering relationships with our African American neighbors in Maryland. Some question the value of these efforts. Alliances between Jewish Americans and other minority groups have frayed. After decades of interfaith work, skeptics point out that some allies have failed to support Jewish Americans in their concerns about Israel and the fight against anti-Semitism. But as I reflect on both the Torah and Tom Friedman’s advice, I believe this is precisely the moment to bring more shovels to the task. Relationships between groups is not a one time dig, but an ongoing process that requires opening and reopening.

Isaac’s story reminds us that progress is not always about creating something new. Sometimes, it’s about preserving and restoring the essential foundations that sustain life and community. In a world increasingly fragmented, reopening these wells of connection and understanding is not just a choice—it’s a necessity.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

 

In the Torah, as Rebekah’s family sends her off to marry Isaac, they offer her a striking blessing. Rather than the typical wishes we might expect for a young bride—health, happiness, and fulfillment—her family’s blessing takes on a surprisingly militaristic tone:

“And they blessed Rebekah and said to her, ‘O sister! May you grow into thousands of myriads; may your descendants seize (יירש) the gates of their foes.’” (Genesis 24:60)

The blessing begins with a wish for Rebekah to have countless descendants, a common and heartfelt hope in biblical times. Yet, this sentiment quickly transforms into something more aggressive: a vision of those descendants prevailing over their enemies and seizing property from within their gates.

Why would Rebekah’s family assume her descendants would have enemies? Her family were shepherds, not warriors. Yet they imagined adversaries living in fortified, gated communities. Perhaps this reflects an ancient prescience—an understanding that the future of Rebekah’s descendants, the Jewish people, would be fraught with conflict. The blessing, then, is both a wish for progeny and a recognition of struggle.

This ancient blessing also seems to reveal a complex, even unsettling, dimension of Jewish identity. The vision of descendants as conquerors may reflect a “shadow side” of the Jewish historical experience. Today, Rebekah’s descendants continue to face adversaries. Some read this blessing as a divine mandate not just to defend against enemies but to seize their territory.

Consider the modern context: Mike Huckabee, a former governor and nominee for U.S. ambassador to Israel, sees a flourishing Israel as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy. Rooted in verses like Rebekah’s blessing, Zionists, both Christian and Jewish, believe Israel should annex more land currently under Palestinian control, fulfilling  the ancient promise for Rebekah’s descendants to “inherit the gates of their foes.”

This interpretation raises profound questions about the interplay between scripture and modern geopolitics. Huckabee’s vision reflects a broader trend among certain Christian Zionists who see the modern state of Israel as central to the second coming of Jesus. However, this view risks turning a poetic blessing into a justification for regional conflict.

The Torah, however, does not give us a one-dimensional message. Verses like Rebekah’s blessing seem to endorse triumph over enemies. However, the Torah also emphasizes the sanctity of life and the pursuit of justice. Deuteronomy reassures Israel that God will protect them from enemies, yet it also records God’s command for Joshua to conquer the land. This tension between defense and conquest runs throughout biblical history.

As we grapple with these ancient texts, we are left with hard questions: How do we balance security with morality? How do we teach our children to value peace in a world where enemies often arise?

For millennia, the Jewish people had no homeland to defend. Since 1948, the modern state of Israel has offered a place of refuge—but also a new set of challenges. How are we, Israel and the Jewish people together, heeding the mixed biblical messages?

Rebekah’s family offered an aggressive vision: to seize the gates of their enemies. Yet, the Torah’s broader message compels us to temper strength with restraint and aggression with justice. The blessing offered to Rebekah is a call to secure the Jewish people and their borders. As Jews, our highest aspiration is to seek peace and uphold the dignity of all people, even amidst conflict.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame