This week nine people killed in a church in Charleston will be laid to rest down in the ground.  14 times in six years there have been mass killings in the United States.  After such a tragedy we might seek some positive message in Torah. This week we learn that from descent comes ascent, and from the depths of despair we can surge forward and upward.

In parasha Chukat for this coming Shabbat, Miriam dies and the miraculous water source that followed the people through the desert has dried up. The people are again on the verge of rebellion. Moses is instructed by God to only speak to a rock to provide water. Instead, Moses strikes the rock and chastises the rebels. It appears as though Moses has lost faith. Even today, we can feel his despair.

In the widely shared video of Jon Stewart on the Daily Show, Stewart noted (I will paraphrase) that he was certain we would look at the problem and again do “jack ***”. The despair that Moses felt again confronting a rebellious people is the same kind of despair Jon Stewart shared with us that night.

Yet the Torah gives us hope.  Soon after, the princes of the tribes dig a well. Water springs up from the well.  New and cooperative leadership provides a solution to the problem. In fact, they do so joyfully, making their voices heard and singing a song as they dig.  And then, in an extraordinary bit of word play, we read that the people travelled from Midbar to Mattanah and from Mattanah to Nahaliel, and from Nahaliel to Bamoth. Translated loosely, the people went from the wilderness to a gift, from a gift to an inheritance and from an inheritance to a high place. In rapid succession, they went from both a geographic and psychological low place to an elevated place on the verge of transformation and entry into the Promised Land. In getting together to solve a problem, they moved forward and upward.

Moses’ leadership was ending in the Torah reading (and Jon Stewart is leaving the Daily Show). I maintain hope that new and cooperative leadership in this country will raise us from the depths of violence and racism, so that we may move forward and upward. We can’t just rely on others. We have to make it so. Will you be among those that retire in despair or will you choose to make your voice heard and dig wells that will spring forth waters of justice and peace?  As a start, share this blog post with others and share your concern with someone else, . . . perhaps a person in Congress, or two.

Rabbi Evan Krame 

We each have had the desire at times to confront our leaders, be they religious or political, and question their actions.  The skill of questioning authority can mean the difference between holiness and sacrilege.

The weekly Torah reading is named for Korach, a prince among the people who stood as an accuser against leaders Moses and Aharon. Korach reproaches Moses of taking on too much, arguing that everyone is holy, and offering that God dwells among all of the people. Up to this point, Korach has made valid observations. Korach’s next question is his undoing. He asks Moses and Aharon, “why do you lift yourselves above the rest of God’s people?” He insinuates that they are pursuing excessive power. Korach is not merely wrong, but will ultimately found to be blasphemous.

Moses’ reaction is to fall upon his face, perhaps a demonstration of his well-known humility. Yet, Moses’ verbal response is not that Korach has wrongly accused Moses but rather that Korach has gathered his minions against God. In a dramatic trial by fire pan, not only incense but Korach’s entire band are consumed.

Were this not the Torah, and were the actor not Moses, would we feel some discomfort with a claim that a leadership challenge is actually an affront to God?  In our times, we’ve been witness to political advocacy claiming legitimacy from religious belief and errant religious leaders hiding behind ecclesiastical authority. So, we might recoil at hearing Moses protect his leadership by painting the accusation as an affront to God. Rather than reject Moses’ rejoinder on this basis, we can find another lesson.

Korach’s story is not a warning to refrain from challenging leadership. The story contains too much nuance to be mistaken for a simple admonition. Rather, this is a cautionary tale about how one speaks to authority. We are reminded of Leviticus 19:17, rebuke your neighbor but do not bear any sin thereby. Questioning authority is a very Jewish impulse. The issue is how we speak. If all are holy, and all can be a container for God’s presence, then we have the responsibility to speak in a lashon kodesh, holy language, and speak as if we truly are worthy of God dwelling among us.

The accusation of Moses lifting himself above the rest becomes blasphemous when understood as an accusation not worthy of the holiness we are given or of God’s dwelling among us.  The upshot is that a would-be accuser should consider that a wrongheaded public accusation against a leader could be as fallacious as denying God. Torah has some suggestions to follow.  First, stay close to the facts.  Second, a public rebuke demands a higher level of scrutiny.  Third, don’t debase anyone with unfounded accusations because that is akin to un-Godly behavior.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

“Clothes make the man,” said Shakespeare (Hamlet I:iii).  Jewish tradition couldn’t agree more.

This week’s Torah portion (Shlach) brings a mitzvah (command) to tie fringes to our clothes.  This is the derivation of the Jewish tallit (prayer shawl) tied with tzitzit (fringes).  Torah records God to tell Moses (Num. 15:37-40): “Speak to the Israelites and tell them to make for themselves fringes on the corners of their garments throughout the ages, then attach to the fringe at each corner a cord of blue.  You will have fringes; looking at [them], you will recall all of God’s commands and do them, so you won’t turn after your hearts and eyes to prostitute yourselves.  Thus you will be reminded to do all My commands and be holy to your God.”

Tradition wisely understood that we distractible humans need physical reminders – like strings tied around the finger – to rivet attention, jog memory and shift behavior toward holy living.  The first of Judaism’s physical reminders was clothing: tzitzit were ancient spirituality’s fashion sense.

Sense for what?  This week’s portion is named for scouts that Moses sent (shlach) to investigate the land that the Israelite wanderers were about to enter.  The scouts returned afraid of the land’s native inhabitants and feeling tiny compared to them – like grasshoppers beneath a giant.  God and Moses rebuked them for false fears, and many died in the ensuing struggle.  Only after that painful story do we encounter Torah’s teaching about blue tzitzit to focus our attention.

Fear comes to every life.  Our fears can lead us astray; we might feel small compared to our challenges or adversaries.  Torah reminds us that we can shift our focus so that our small fears won’t dominate us, and that we can use what we see – even the clothes we wear – to shift our focus.  The tallit evokes God’s light: we imagine God to be clothed in light (Ps. 104), so we wrap ourselves in a garment of light.  Onto those vestments evoking holy light, we tie threads to remind us of this week’s story of scouts who felt too small.  We wear this garment as a protective cloak against fear and unholy distraction.  Whatever your fashion sense, make in your life a visible reminder that you come clothed in light and strength.  Wear that garment grandly, and do not fear.

Rabbi David Evan Markus

The parsha baha’alotecha is “my family parsha”. My uncle read it when he became a bar mitzvah eighty-nine years ago, my son read it nineteen years ago and my cousin read it for her bat mitzvah just six years ago. Additionally, the prophetic portion, the haftarah, from Zechariah is also read at Hanukkah and two more of us in the family read that haftarah thirty eight and forty three years ago at Hanukkah for our b’nai mitzvah. The linkage with the haftarah and Hannukah is the instruction in the Torah portion regarding the lighting of the menorah in the Temple.  My family views our “sharing” of this portion over three generations as our way of keeping the menorah lit.

Handing traditions down from one generation to another is a way we can feel connected to ancestors we may have never gotten to know. The different ways family observe Pesach – do you eat “kitniyot” like the Sefardim or stay away from them like the Ashkenazim – connects us to relatives who lived across the world from us. But what happens when those inherited traditions no longer resonate? Should we continue something when its only value is the “tradition” or should it be dropped for something more compelling? How can we feel connected and not constrained by tradition?

There is a wonderful short film which shows the grandmother making gefilte fish from scratch, grinding the fish, mixing it, seasoning it and cooking it. The daughter buys a pre-made gefilte fish loaf, seasons it and cooks it. The granddaughter buys pre-cooked gefilte fish in a jar.

We can apply our creativity to work with the tradition to reshape it and restore meaning as well as begin new traditions. Shavuot, the holiday seven weeks after Passover, recalls the receiving of the Ten Commandments. For many of us it is about cheesecake and studying, maybe even confirmation. I propose a reframing and that it become the time when we think about what we want to hand down in the next year and what we want to receive. We can be more intentional about sharing what is important to us if we have a particular time each year that calls us to pay attention to what we have received that we can pass on as well as what we have yet to receive.

What will you pass on to others this year?
JoHanna Potts

Age is an invitation and not a closed door. Take this week’s Torah portion, Naso. A census of the Levitical tribes is required. The priests with caretaking duties between the ages of 30 and 50 are recorded and enlisted for duties in the Tent of Meeting, where sacrifices were offered.  We can opine as to why this age range was best suited for priestly duties – was it an assumption about agility or ability peaking between these ages? Perhaps it was merely to limit the ages of services so as to allow another generation to learn and step up to the tasks. I was intrigued by a more modern idea. Perhaps it is that at different ages we can offer different qualities of spiritual leadership. For me, this is an opportunity to notice how new doors of spiritual leadership opened for me after the age of 50.

I do not claim to be priest-like, but I am a recently ordained Rabbi. I was 56 on the day of my ordination. I am acutely aware of my age, not because I fear death or disability, but rather in gratitude that I have the skills at this age to lead and inspire others and even the chance for more personal growth. In Biblical understanding, there are many age indicators. 20 years is the age of counting males in the census for a military role (Numbers 1:3). 70 years is considered a full life (Psalm 90:10). Despite any indication from the Torah that I may be past my peak age for certain priestly duties, I believe that I am in prime time for a rabbinical role. I have life experience to share.  I have had personal challenges to both soften my heart and toughen my skin.  I have an ever expanding spiritual life and relationship with God, that I would not have imagined possible when I was 30 or even 50.

There was a time when my mind may have better retained new information or when I could hit a tennis ball much harder. Yet, I try to focus on the new opportunities offered me precisely because I am 57. It just means that I accept the limitations as well as the capacities. This does not cause me to despair but rather connect with the application of wisdom gained by my life experience. There are new opportunities in growing and maturing. As Reb Zalman Schachter-Shalomi, z’l, described it, I want to transform “aging into saging.”

Rabbi Evan Krame

If you’re reading this blogpost, your ancestors probably hailed from another continent.  Most of us focus more on where we are than from where we’ve come.  Today we might know little of our ancestral history: memories fade, wars ravage, families scatter and interest wanes.  Yet, there are many advantages to recalling the names of those who made possible our lives.

Into our complex relationship with ancestry comes this week’s Torah portion (Bamidbar), opening the Book of Numbers. Picking up where we left off at the end of the Book of Exodus, the Israelites take a census to record tribal numbers, names and places.  This census, at the start of our ancestors’ next phase of journeying, reminds us that who and where we are depends on who and where we’ve been.  History lives through us, and we and our children will live more fully if we know how we got here – the stories, the struggles and the sacrifices.

This truth takes on even more poignant meaning when we parse Torah’s words.  The Israelite census was to count all males over age 20 – then the age of adulthood.  How Torah (Num. 1:2-3) described those adults and the task of counting them brings powerful spiritual focus to our own remembering and counting:

· Lift up – שאו את ראש כל עדת בני ישראל למשפחתם לבית אבתם במספר שמות / “Count (literally lift up) every head among the community of the children of Israel by family, by their ancestral homes, by their number of names.”  Today many Jews avoid “counting” people (a reaction to Holocaust branding of numbered tattoos on forearms), but in ancient days counting meant uplifting – not just to numerically count take cognizance, but to identify, to really see. What if we all counted and encountered each other that way?

· Your entire history – כל זכר לגלגלתם מבן עשרים שנה ומעלה  / “All males by their polls from age 20 and above.”  These words have military significance, but also a secret mystical meaning: all to remember their reincarnations, from age 20 and above , or for the less mystically bent, all to remember their cycles.  Counting means remembering everything in our lives that came before, how we got to adulthood, our life patterns that make us who we are.  What if we really inhabited our emotional and spiritual history this way?

· To empower your Godwrestle – כל יצא צבא ישראל / “All able to do battle for Israel.”  These words confirm that the census had a military purpose, but we can understand it spiritually as All able to go out among the hosts of Godwrestlers, because “Israel” means to wrestle with God (Gen. 32:29).

Lift up your entire history to empower your Godwrestle.” – Rediscover who we’ve been to empower whom we might become. Harness your cycles and totality of strength for your spiritual struggles. Leave nothing and no one behind on your way.  We have this opportunity because our ancestors journeyed to bequeath us this gift.  Let’s remember, to help make it count.

Take a breather: rest isn’t just for the weary.  That’s the enduring message of this week’s double portion ending the Book of Leviticus (Behar-Bechutotai, Lev. 25:1-27:34).

In our ancestors’ society, spiritual truth translated from agricultural means.  Our ancestors worked the land, planting and reaping harvests, so often they expressed spiritual truths in terms of the land.  To them, Shabbat was more than a weekly day of rest: it was a principle of ethics and good stewardship of the land.  Even the land, they knew, needs a Shabbat.  Their land-Shabbat came every seven years – the Shmitta year of letting the land lay fallow, recharge and gather back its strength, so that it can continue to remain productive.  To make a land-Shabbat work, the people had to rely on what they had reaped the prior six years, which led them to be not only good agriculturists but also good economists: they had to save, mindful in the other six years that the land would have its Shabbat.

In our day, we might save for retirement or save for rainy days, but few of us save for sabbatical years.  Few of us take sabbatical years.  In today’s fast-paced economy, even the rare person whose job entitles him or her to take sabbaticals rarely does so.

And yet, this system on which modern society mostly turned its back is the root of what we call “liberty.”  In our ancestors’ sense, “liberty” is what happens when we have a Jubilee Year – the year marking every seventh cycle of seven years (the 50th year), when land ownership reverted back and debts were cancelled.  From this system of Shmitta and Jubilee derived our understanding of not only good land stewardship but also fairness and justice – indeed, our very understanding of liberty itself.  From this system comes the quote on the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia: “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land for all its inhabitants” (Lev. 25:10).

Liberty, we learn, is tied to the land, to fairness and justice, to letting the earth have her due.  We need only observe today’s geopolitical disruptions arising from environmental injustice, global climate change making water and food unstable for vast swaths of the world, to appreciate the subtle wisdom of our agricultural ancestors.

How we work the land – how we tend the earth, how we care for the planet – is essential to our lived spirituality.  Our planet has the capacity to produce enough food for a hungry world, but only if we tend it wisely – honoring the planet’s cycles of time, water and air.  Honoring the God-spark among all the people means shifting from unfettered production to wise stewardship.  It means taking a breather: as partners with God, this is our responsibility and our spiritual calling.

The Jewish Studio/JoHanna Potts, Rabbi David Evan Markus


The legacy of the Jewish people includes a striving for perfection in ourselves, in our children and in the world. The quest for perfection inherently acknowledges that each of us is imperfect in some ways. In Parashat Emor, such defects are presented as a barrier. If taken on its face, this barrier could be confused for a defect in the Torah.

We read in Parashat Emor at Leviticus 21:21 about the ritual of offerings to the Lord by the priests where it says “no man among the offspring of Aaron the priest who has a defect shall be qualified to offer the Lord’s offering.” The defects noted range from a broken arm to a short leg to crushed testes.  One can only suppose that this passage suggests that the priests’ physical imperfections would detract from the holiness or sanctity of the offering.

In our modern religious practices, having abandoned tangible sacrifices at an altar, we strive for perfection in the observance. Why else would we have so many rules about when and where rituals are observed? Take a common example such as lighting Shabbat candles. The exact time of lighting is announced in emails and the methodology of lighting the candles is passed down through the generations. With all of our myriad Jewish rituals, our physical attributes are not the issue. Every Jew, with frailties or abilities, is bound to the laws and traditions. 

Yet, in this instance, Torah exhibits a bias against persons whose bodies are less able or less well designed. It is a bias exhibited and limited to the time of making offerings to God and at the altar before the mishkan which is described as God’s dwelling. This exclusion is painful for me to read. After dozens of years of working with persons who are less abled, I’ve known that holiness is often best found in the interaction where abilities and disabilities complement one another.  The doctors who heal. The therapists who restore motion. The teachers who educate. They may be the Priests of today. And each one of those professionals have their own defects of some sort. We all do.

If in Torah even a priest with a broken leg that can mend or a growth in his eye that can be healed is not eligible to offer a sacrifice, aren’t we really being told that none of us are eligible? Or perhaps the best explanation is that no one should think of themselves as eligible to make offerings to God if they think of themselves as better than anyone else. We bring our whole selves with our defects to the rituals we perform and in pursuit of perfecting a damaged world. In fact it is our desire to surmount imperfections that fuels the engine of making the world a better place.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

This week’s double portion, Acharei Mot-Kedoshim (Lev. 16:1-20:27), contains the famous phrase that Talmud’s Rabbi Akiva recited while standing on one leg to summarize all of Torah (B.T. Shabbat 31a): “love your neighbor as yourself” (Lev. 19:18).  This phrase, emerging from the middle part of Torah’s middle portion dedicated to kedoshim (holiness), is the beating heart of Torah and living pulse of Jewish spirituality.  This mitzvah (connecting command) to love others as ourselves is so central to Jewish life that it might as well be Torah’s innermost sanctum, the Holy of Holies at Torah’s very core.

“Love your neighbor as yourself” – easy words to say, but sometimes difficult words to live.  In the rush of modern life, sometimes we forget.  Sometimes our neighbors don’t seem especially lovable.  Sometimes we ourselves feel too strained, hurt or bothered to love anyone (including ourselves).  Human life can be difficult, and in those moments of difficulty, it can be especially difficult to love another as we love ourselves.

Difficult, but not impossible.  Jewish spirituality is meant to be lived precisely in the messiness of life, not cleanly adorned, venerated from afar or cloistered safely away.  Jewish tradition’s sages were eminently practical: key to their creed was the idea that God, Torah and tradition must ask only what is possible (B.T. Bava Kama 84a, Chullin 11b, Niddah 67b) – lest spirituality be only theoretical, frustrating, guilt-provoking or worse.   The mitzvot of spirituality and good living aren’t far away – across the sea or in the heavens – but rather already in our mouths and hearts, so we can do them (Deut. 30:11-14).

Even if these words at Torah’s heart might be familiar and close, however, we still need pointers, a how-to primer when life gets hard.  The rest of this week’s Torah portion surrounding these heart-words provides exactly such a primer, full of pointers on how to live a neighbor-loving life.  Give to the poor, protect the disabled (don’t curse the deaf or put stumbling blocks before the blind), honor parents, maintain fair weights and measures in commerce, – the list goes on and on.  Perhaps some of these pointers reflect Torah’s pre-industrial context of the ancient Near East, though many of these pointers seem as prescient in 21st century America as they did millennia ago.  All of them together offer us a timeless formula for holy living.

Maybe your own formula for holy living looks a bit different.  Maybe if you could write your own Holiness Code, it would cite different examples.  So go ahead: make your list.  Really – make a list of what holy living would be for you.  Odds are good that whatever your list about holy living, it might read a lot like Rabbi Akiva’s essence of Torah on one foot: love your neighbor as yourself.  Whatever your own examples of holy living might be, they are only examples of this timeless core of wisdom.  In Rabbi Akiva’s famous words, all the rest is commentary – now go and study.

Rabbi David Evan Markus

This week we have a double portion, Tazria and Metzora. They both deal with the reasons for creating boundaries of time and space, and fixes due to being tamae, ritually unsure, or tahor, ritually, pure. For many who look at these two portions, they seem confusing, unsophisticated, and sexist. These are two of my favorite parshiot for those reasons – they cause me to look harder at them to find something relevant for this time and place. 

Even though we don’t participate in the sacrificial cult at the Temple any longer, we do begin morning prayers with “My God, the soul You have given me is pure” and in my head I hear Debbie Friedman’s  z”l voice singing those words. Therefore, the questions about which I want to seek possible answers are these. What might change this soul from its state of purity?  Is that what tamae and tahor are describing?

I lean toward the understanding that when humans come in contact with a particular point on the life-death continuum, they become tamae. Even doing important mitzvot, such as giving birth and burying the dead, cause one to become tamae. In order to return to tahor requires time, water, and sometimes blood. The original elements present at birth – the infant isn’t considered tamae, only the mother. It seems to be a remarkable system that says, “You have just experienced something powerful or potentially life-giving or perhaps the opposite, death. Take some time to appreciate that experience, then you can return to your normal routine.” Or in ritual language, you can return to being tahor. 

 We have constructed our lives wanting full control over our time, so we see this “time out” as a punishment, rather than permission to not do something.  We like being able to fill our time with work, entertainment, family, exercise, etc. We have leisure time (even if it doesn’t feel that way), so perhaps we don’t appreciate the requirement to take time. But have you heard some say they need a “sick day?” Isn’t that asking permission to be prohibited from working? Physical ailments may force us to take some time.  Turning from the physical to the spiritual, how do we know if our souls are healthy? Maybe we all need to take some time to think about that.