This is the beginning of the month of Elul, the month that precedes the holiday-packed month of Tishrei. It is now that we begin sounding the shofar daily, signaling that it is the time to prepare for the transformation we hope to make in the coming year. First we must look into our spiritual mirror and honestly at ourselves. We need to engage in a “soul searching” that reveals ways in which we hold ourselves back, act out of fear and close ourselves off to different ways of seeing our role within this world. This isn’t an occupation review. It is about how you do, not what you do. There are a few questions to consider in this process: 

How are we living up to being made in the image of God and seeing others as made in the divine image as well? How can we be our most generous selves? Do we give others the benefit of the doubt? How do we feel and express gratitude? Do we see the wonder in our world? How do we alleviate the pain others may feel? How do we support our community? How do we pursue justice?

If we find, while gazing in that spiritual mirror, that the image of ourselves reflected back doesn’t yet match our aspirations, each day gives us an opportunity to come closer to it.

 

by JoHanna Potts

This week’s Torah portion (Re’eh, “See!”) recaps key aspects of Jewish tradition – monotheism, freedom, holidays and dietary laws. Perhaps its most important line, however, is a deceptively simple call: “After YHVH your God you will walk” (Deut. 13:5). What might it mean in our day to “walk in God’s ways”?

It seems straightforward to follow something physical: the Book of Exodus ends with the image of desert literally following God’s “cloud by day and fire by night” (Ex. 40:38). God, however, isn’t to be seen (Ex. 33:20). And if “God’s ways” were only Torah’s laws and traditions, then Torah might simply tell us to follow them: Torah wouldn’t need to add “walk in God’s ways.”

This question has called and confounded people for centuries. Talmud asked, “How can a human being walk after God?” Talmud’s answer was to walk after God’s attributes (B.T. Sotah 14a):

As God clothes the naked [like Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden], so we also should clothe the naked. As God visited the sick [like Abraham after his circumcision], so we also should visit the sick. As God comforted mourners [like Isaac after Abraham’s death], so we also should comfort mourners. As God buried the dead [like Moses in the desert], so we also should bury the dead.

In this understanding, behaviors – clothing the naked, visiting the sick, comforting the mourner, burying the dead – evoke God’s attributes. But God is more than behaviors and attributes: God is holy. “Be holy,” Torah records God to say, “for I, YHVH your God, am holy” (Lev. 19:2). To be holy, our ancestors imagined, is to be merciful and gracious – qualities more expansive and dynamic than any fixed set of behaviors or laws. After all, we can’t codify God any more than we can squeeze or freeze God into any one idea however glorious and grand. Maybe that’s why tradition calls us into both particulars practices and overarching qualities – verbs and also adjectives, specific acts of our hands and also loftiness of our souls. Like a tree needs both deep roots and tall branches, we humans need both the rooting of specific behaviors and the high and holy aspirations of spirit.

In a recent lesson, I asked a child how we earth-bound humans can be holy and “walk in God’s ways”? At first she offered a list of behaviors – follow laws, obey parents, do homework, etc. – but quickly she switched into listing attributes. To be holy, she concluded, was to love… have compassion… be forgiving… be generous… be kind…. be patient. To be holy, she decided, is to see the world as God sees the world, and try to see as we imagine God might see.

“And a little child will lead them” (Isaiah 11:6).

R’ David Evan Markus

Were the Bible written today, it might include wisdom on start-up businesses, communitarian governance, positive psychology and organizational skills. At least those are the “bibles” I notice people reading around me nowadays. To the modern purveyors of how-to business literature, success often means not only financial reward but also position in the industry, innovating for the future and organizational restructuring. These principles are not just for businessmen. Non-profit organizations spend huge amounts of time on new modes of operation, financial development and creative marketing. They measure success by metrics – emails opened, clicks on links, donations made, attendance at events. Why not wonder if business contributes to creating a healthy society or if non-profits sustain the souls of people?

Success in the ancient Jewish world would have meant rainfall when needed, healthy animals and abundant food. Eager to prime the pump with the Source of plenty, sacrifices would be offered and rules were admonished (but not always followed). It is a model we find the second of three paragraphs following the Shema, which traditionally we read twice daily. Some progressive Jews have stopped reading this altogether: a Torah of reward and punishment is challenging to the modern Jew.

I think that there is a common flaw with the nouveau guidebooks on success and the way we are wont to read Torah. It is not so much what is said but how we receive the message. Torah isn’t about believing that a prescription will yield a positive healthful result.  Torah is about faith in a Creator/Source/Power that sets in motion the possibility of reward and the potential for punishment. For example, if we don’t take care of the earth and if we pollute and scorch the atmosphere, then we plant the seeds of our “punishment” growing naturally from our actions. And if we care for each other and share resources well, then we plant the seeds of those “rewards.” God is in the formula.  God is the inspiration and the energy to make change happen.

There is reward and punishment in the collective sense of identifying core values and upholding them in our work and in our society. Torah inspires us to reach beyond literal meaning and focus on the planetary and societal goals that our activities and livelihoods should serve. Along with every book on starting a business or restructuring operations, there should be a reminder from Torah that we must measure success by the qualities of meeting collective needs – preserving and enhancing life. Let that be our bottom line. Add peace, freedom, protection, and resources to the list of metrics of success: let those be our bottom line. With that kind of how-to and purpose to what we do, we can live out heavenly days right here on this earth.

R’ Evan Krame

Is the key to a good life found in following the rules? For example, consider the rules of suburbia: study hard in good schools, work hard at our professions, care for our bodies and obey the laws. We assure ourselves that if we live by these rules, we are likely to succeed. Some of us have suffered the consequence of not paying careful attention or forgetting the rules, stumbling over the laws, or erring badly in our practices – even if unintentionally. The discovery of such errors may bring adverse consequences to our livelihood, personal lives or health. How do we find comfort when our own fallibility trips up our preconceived notions of how life should proceed?

A primary resource on the topic begins this week’s Torah reading.  An angry and frustrated Moses has pleaded with God to allow his passage into the Promised Land. Moses failed to follow God’s instructions earlier by hitting a rock to draw water when all he needed to do was call out. Moses is not only denied entry but is then told by God not to raise the issue again. Further, Moses is instructed to ascend to where he can see the land he may not enter. God may be telling Moses to fully experience disappointment; to acknowledge and accept is the key to moving on.

Despite his outrage or perhaps to channel his misery, Moses employs his oratory skills and turns to the multitudes that will cross into the land. Moses gives them instruction and warning. They are advised to use their senses of sight and hearing and obey the rules so that they may successfully acquire their new homeland. To make the point he employs two of the most well-known textual readings of Judaism, the Shema Yisrael (Listen up Israel) and the Aseret Dibrot (Ten Commandments). Simply put, the two lessons are pay careful attention and obey the laws.

Moses takes his own disappointment and frustration and channels it into a methodology and teaching for the next generation to use. The advice still works as a coping mechanism for those who have a sense that their life plan was derailed by their own failures. If we can’t obtain a second chance for ourselves, we might find some satisfaction in teaching the next generation to use their senses and carefully obey the rules. The Torah teaches that comfort and consolation begin with the internal mechanisms of acknowledgement and acceptance.  Recovery from disappointment may be found in teaching from experience.

In the seven weeks approaching the High Holidays, a time of repentance, we must first acknowledge and accept the errors of our past before we can consider improvements in our lives.

See the path of your life.  Really see it.  What do you see?  Do you like what you see?  If not, what readiness do you need to change it?

This week’s Torah portion (Dvarim) heralds the approach of Tisha b’Av, commemorating the destruction of the Temple and countless other tragedies in Jewish history.  It also heralds Shabbat Chazon, the coming Shabbat before Tisha b’Av named for this week’s Haftarah portion (Isaiah 1:1-1:27), which begins with Isaiah’s Chazon (vision) about dire consequences of poor life choices.

We might be forgiven for seeing here mostly doom and gloom: after all, we’re approaching the Black Sabbath (not the rock band, but the darkest moment of the Jewish year). Doom and gloom have their place, but there also is light: Tisha b’Av carries also the kernel of liberation, the breaching of inner walls that make new journeys and freedoms possible.  As Leonard Cohen so poignantly wrote in his song Anthem, “There’s a crack in everything: that’s how the light gets in.”

What we’re called to see is light – even and especially light amidst the doomsayers, darkness and destructions that are inevitable parts of life. We’re called to see the true reality of our lives, beyond the walls, unprotected by walls, freed from walls.  We’re called to see the path before us and begin again, like the journeys recounted in this week’s Torah portion, to get up from our doldrums and go.

But go where?  Desert journeys we recall in this week’s Torah portion are long past, but we recall them now as metaphor for our journey of the next seven weeks, between now and Rosh Hashanah – a mirror-image of the seven weeks between Passover (liberation) and Shavuot (revelation).  Once again, like our desert forebears, we can journey from narrowness to expansiveness, from darkness to light, from brokenness to a new wholeness.  The journey will take effort, but the effort is the purpose of the journey.

That is the deep meaning of this week of preparation, this moment of seeing clearly the path stretching before us.  May your vision be clear as we ready for this journey anew.

Rabbi David Evan Markus

Words have power. Reputations can be created or destroyed by a 144 character tweet. Words connecting us to God had power for our biblical ancestors, as reflected in the third commandment to not swear falsely by Y-H-V-H’s name. And by Balaam’s inability to undo his unintentional blessing of the Israelites – “how goodly are your tents”. Yet, we read in this week’s parshiyot that men’s words have more staying power than women’s. The vows that men make to God are absolute. The vows that women make depend on the male in her life permitting the vow to stand as long as she has a male in her life. There are reasons for this: one is that the vow constrains her future behavior; a second is that she was not an independent person; and the third is to protect her from the guilt of not fulfilling her vow.

Women’s independent status then was due to her responsibilities to her husband and household, the source of her economic security. In fact, a widow was able to make a vow and have it stand. The Rabbis of the Talmud had a problem with vows in general and there is an 11 chapter tractate, Nedarim (Vows) in Nashim (Women), an order of the Mishnah, addressing this. The rabbis saw most vows as impulsive and extreme and therefore in conflict with their general approach of “moderate and elevate”.

What should we think about the holding power of vows today? It was thinking about this that gave me new insight into the Kol Nidre (All Vows) prayer. Each year on Erev Yom Kippur we ask God to release us from all vows made from now until the next Yom Kippur. Historically, there were Jews who had no more independence to make or fulfill vows than did the women in ancient Israel. Some pretended to convert away from Judaism in order to survive knowing that the vow would not be fulfilled.  Rather than live with the guilt (or sin) of this, the Yom Kippur prayer allows them to keep the power of words, of vows to God, intact and released the proclaimer of guilt.

None of us have real control of our future, therefore, vows controlling our future behavior may not be able to be fulfilled. Kol Nidre may subtly warn us to not make vows we can’t keep while it asks God to release up from vows that we will be unable to keep. Let’s keep playing Words with Friends, and also spend time focusing on words with God.

JoHanna Potts

Women and Men are equal. Why would I even need to write those words? The Torah reading for this week, Pinchas, incorporates a story of a rung on the ladder to climb a wall toward such equality. We have not yet finished the climb.

We read that the five daughters of a man named Zelophehad demand their share of his inheritance in a world where women had no such rights.  After consultation with God, Moses offers limited rights to these women.  With further push back from the men of their tribe, their inheritance rights are later affirmed but limited in scope.  Two steps up, and one step down.

Women are still seeking equal rights.  I am acutely reminded of this with the death of Rabbi Bonna Haberman on June 16, 2015.  Bonna was the founder of Women of the Wall, a group pressing for egalitarian prayer at the Western Wall.  For decades, she brought awareness that women have an equal claim to pray and ultimately access to God in all places, especially at the remaining wall of the holy Temple in Jerusalem.

That same week, the modern Orthodox Yeshivat Maharat in New York ordained five more women. While the Orthodox leadership is not ready to call them rabbis, a rose by any other name.

There are many examples of women’s degradation in this world. I choose this week to be inspired by the climb toward equality of women in our faith communities. We have not yet reached the heights.  There’s more wall yet to scale.

Women’s equality, gay rights, inclusion for persons with disabilities, ending racism, . . . all of these human rights are processes which remain unrealized goals.  The Torah points us to note a starting place and reminds us that the process will happen in fits and starts.  As the Talmud teaches, it is not your job to complete the task (of perfecting the world), but neither are you free to desist from it.  pirke avot 2:21).  In the wake of July 4 Independence Day, remember to keep the momentum toward full human rights going in your interactions.  Check your bias. Open your eyes and your hearts. Extend your hands. Be an advocate. If you are a woman, demand your share.  Keep climbing.

Rabbi Evan Krame.

For all of Torah’s miracles large and small, this week’s story of a talking donkey who sees an angel is perhaps Torah’s most magical and childlike narrative. In its words lurks a profound secret that touches (and challenges) the core of our adult sense of good and evil, right and wrong.

Parshat Balak is named for a king who sends his mystic holy man, Bilam, to curse Jews. God doesn’t want Bilam to go, and sends a series of mishaps for Bilam’s journey. Bilam stubbornly insists on fulfilling Balak’s command, and God ultimately uses diversions to turn Bilam’s heart – not to curse the Jews but to bless them.

Our story picks up in Num. 22:22, “And God’s anger was kindled because [Bilam] went, and God’s angel positioned himself in the way to inhibit him.” At first only the donkey Bilam was riding saw the angel, sword in hand. The donkey turned aside: Bilam hit the donkey, so the donkey squeezed himself against a wall and crushed Bilam’s foot.  Bilam hit her again, so she dropped and trapped Bilam. After Bilam hit her a third time, the donkey spoke to Bilam – that’ll get his attention! – and lo, Bilam saw the angel. Bilam’s eyes, heart, journey and mission instantly transformed.

“God’s angel positioned himself in the way to inhibit [Bilam].” In Hebrew, Torah’s word “inhibit” means to “redirect” or “be adverse to.” Torah’s word is לשטן – “to Satan.” Yes, that Satan – a word today connoting the devil, evil, God’s foil, Superman’s Lex Luthor – the opposite of angelic.

The Jewish Satan, however, is no such thing. God’s angel stands against Bilam to redirect him for good according to God’s plan. That’s the original Jewish Satan – divine redirection. Centuries later, Satan appeared as a loyal prosecutor, as in the Book of Job. This loyal prosecutor became in Greek diabolos (“accuser”), whose legend evolved into the diabolic Devil thwarting God, let loose by the Fall of Man. This Hellenistic and later Christian evolution came full-circle in medieval Judaism, which re-absorbed then-Christian legends about the Devil: Jews then imported from Christianity a re-imagined Satan disguised as a Snake who tempted Eve, a bad boy who tempted Noah to drink, and other Biblical troublemakers. Centuries later, Satan seems separate from God, and the devil of evil pitchfork infamy was born.

The devil we know, however, is the holy power of divine redirection – things that don’t work because they shouldn’t, blocks appearing on roads we shouldn’t travel. The Jewish idea of Satan invites us to stop and ask: “Does this obstacle suggest a higher purpose for my journey?  Does this roadblock mean I shouldn’t travel this highway?” Satan asks us not automatically to retreat from challenge, but to discern from our highest wisdom and spirit – and invite redirection for good. That’s the kind of “devil” we all ought to know. Rabbi David Markus

This week nine people killed in a church in Charleston will be laid to rest down in the ground.  14 times in six years there have been mass killings in the United States.  After such a tragedy we might seek some positive message in Torah. This week we learn that from descent comes ascent, and from the depths of despair we can surge forward and upward.

In parasha Chukat for this coming Shabbat, Miriam dies and the miraculous water source that followed the people through the desert has dried up. The people are again on the verge of rebellion. Moses is instructed by God to only speak to a rock to provide water. Instead, Moses strikes the rock and chastises the rebels. It appears as though Moses has lost faith. Even today, we can feel his despair.

In the widely shared video of Jon Stewart on the Daily Show, Stewart noted (I will paraphrase) that he was certain we would look at the problem and again do “jack ***”. The despair that Moses felt again confronting a rebellious people is the same kind of despair Jon Stewart shared with us that night.

Yet the Torah gives us hope.  Soon after, the princes of the tribes dig a well. Water springs up from the well.  New and cooperative leadership provides a solution to the problem. In fact, they do so joyfully, making their voices heard and singing a song as they dig.  And then, in an extraordinary bit of word play, we read that the people travelled from Midbar to Mattanah and from Mattanah to Nahaliel, and from Nahaliel to Bamoth. Translated loosely, the people went from the wilderness to a gift, from a gift to an inheritance and from an inheritance to a high place. In rapid succession, they went from both a geographic and psychological low place to an elevated place on the verge of transformation and entry into the Promised Land. In getting together to solve a problem, they moved forward and upward.

Moses’ leadership was ending in the Torah reading (and Jon Stewart is leaving the Daily Show). I maintain hope that new and cooperative leadership in this country will raise us from the depths of violence and racism, so that we may move forward and upward. We can’t just rely on others. We have to make it so. Will you be among those that retire in despair or will you choose to make your voice heard and dig wells that will spring forth waters of justice and peace?  As a start, share this blog post with others and share your concern with someone else, . . . perhaps a person in Congress, or two.

Rabbi Evan Krame 

We each have had the desire at times to confront our leaders, be they religious or political, and question their actions.  The skill of questioning authority can mean the difference between holiness and sacrilege.

The weekly Torah reading is named for Korach, a prince among the people who stood as an accuser against leaders Moses and Aharon. Korach reproaches Moses of taking on too much, arguing that everyone is holy, and offering that God dwells among all of the people. Up to this point, Korach has made valid observations. Korach’s next question is his undoing. He asks Moses and Aharon, “why do you lift yourselves above the rest of God’s people?” He insinuates that they are pursuing excessive power. Korach is not merely wrong, but will ultimately found to be blasphemous.

Moses’ reaction is to fall upon his face, perhaps a demonstration of his well-known humility. Yet, Moses’ verbal response is not that Korach has wrongly accused Moses but rather that Korach has gathered his minions against God. In a dramatic trial by fire pan, not only incense but Korach’s entire band are consumed.

Were this not the Torah, and were the actor not Moses, would we feel some discomfort with a claim that a leadership challenge is actually an affront to God?  In our times, we’ve been witness to political advocacy claiming legitimacy from religious belief and errant religious leaders hiding behind ecclesiastical authority. So, we might recoil at hearing Moses protect his leadership by painting the accusation as an affront to God. Rather than reject Moses’ rejoinder on this basis, we can find another lesson.

Korach’s story is not a warning to refrain from challenging leadership. The story contains too much nuance to be mistaken for a simple admonition. Rather, this is a cautionary tale about how one speaks to authority. We are reminded of Leviticus 19:17, rebuke your neighbor but do not bear any sin thereby. Questioning authority is a very Jewish impulse. The issue is how we speak. If all are holy, and all can be a container for God’s presence, then we have the responsibility to speak in a lashon kodesh, holy language, and speak as if we truly are worthy of God dwelling among us.

The accusation of Moses lifting himself above the rest becomes blasphemous when understood as an accusation not worthy of the holiness we are given or of God’s dwelling among us.  The upshot is that a would-be accuser should consider that a wrongheaded public accusation against a leader could be as fallacious as denying God. Torah has some suggestions to follow.  First, stay close to the facts.  Second, a public rebuke demands a higher level of scrutiny.  Third, don’t debase anyone with unfounded accusations because that is akin to un-Godly behavior.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame