Monty Python remains one of my favorite sources of comic relief. They find humor in absurdity. Python’s comedy is rooted in a futile search for significance in an incomprehensible universe. Have you seen their movie “The Meaning of Life,” utterly devoted to countenancing the absurd?

Take the Dead Parrot Sketch. A man walks into a pet shop, hoping to return a recently purchased “Norwegian Blue” parrot, which is clearly dead. The shopkeeper, however, refuses to acknowledge that fact. “It’s pining for the fjords,” “It’s resting,” “Stunned,”—his insistence that the dead parrot is alive borders on madness until the customer bangs the petrified bird on the countertop. To make matters worse, the shopkeeper offers the customer a slug in exchange.

The sketch hinges on a basic assumption: that we expect others to see things as they are—or at least as they appear. The pet store proprietor clings to being wrong. But we all know the absurdity of people whose reality ignores facts and disregards truth. This shift from reality transforms the dead parrot sketch into a surreal, comic experience.

Monty Python taps into our deep-seated desire for order and meaning in a universe that refuses to provide either order or meaning. Sometimes, the world seems like that pet shop, doubling down on lies. Your best response may be to bang a dead parrot on the countertop.

The Pythons look at the world and find indifference, chaos, and futility. But instead of despair, they point out how funny that can be.

Life doesn’t always make sense, and we should not pretend it does. So, who is tasked with pointing out life’s absurdities? For one, comedians. Not just the comedians, though—also the rabbis. Comedians would have you believe that absurdity is merely fodder for humor. The world continues being preposterous, just for laughs.

On the other hand, the rabbis witness absurdity and ask you to have belief and faith. For rabbis, it’s not the absurdity of the world that matters, but rather how we respond.

Albert Camus, author of The Stranger, rebelled against escaping from the harshness of the human condition. For him, a true hero accepts that life is bleak and, even, if meaningless, presses forward, nonetheless. Camus’ ideal is Sisyphus, condemned to roll a rock up a mountain daily, only to watch it roll back down that night. Despite the failure, and the absurdity of the task, Sisyphus tries again. Comedians have tried to tackle the tale of Sisyphus but there are very few good jokes about him. There’s this one joke about Sisyphus but it goes on and on and on. . .

Camus finds meaning in struggling each day, even if it is without reward. Camus despised the madness, violence, and oppression of the 20th century. His response was to appreciate living each day, even as we accept the insanity of returning to push rocks up hills followed by the inevitability of death. Judaism is more hopeful than Camus. We believe that life demands we seek better options than pushing a rock up a hill.

Two Jewish holidays focus on responding to life’s absurdity: Yom Kippur and Purim. On Yom Kippur, we ask, “Who shall live, and who shall die?  We rehearse for death by wearing white and fasting. There’s a book in heaven marking our fate and gates that close at day’s end. We are praying for life, while fully confronting death. These rituals may seem farcical. But these rituals help us to focus on ways of responding to the world’s inherent irrationality.

The other holiday of absurdity is Purim. The Zohar, Judaism’s premier mystical text, connects Yom Kippur and Purim. The pairing lies in the name: “Yom HaKippurim,” implying that something absurd or random will happen in the future. The mystics believe that one Yom Kippur to come, we will rejoice and dance, transforming difficulties into delight.

Purim is an absurd story. Esther, a Jew, married the Persian King. When a decree was issued to kill the Jews, she asked her people to fast and pray. (Sort of like Yom Kippur when we fast and pray to avert the decree). Esther revealed her Jewish identity to the King and exposed Haman’s plot to kill the Jews.

The King, in a bizarre twist, issued a new decree allowing the Jews to defend themselves by killing the people originally ordered to destroy them—and the Jews did so. Yes, the world always finds it absurd that Jews can destroy their enemies.

One could interpret Purim as comedy. Rather, I see it as a story of faith and courage. Because sometimes, absurdity, like a King’s proclamation, is neither benign nor comical but rather quite dangerous. Time and again, Jews fought/fight for life in the face of a pointless decree of death. Purim is about faith in the future, taking ownership of Jewish identity at a time when it was imprudent to do so.

Is faith absurd? Rabbi Noah Farkas wrote, “Many philosophers call the idea of faith “‘living in the absurd”’ because we can never truly know life’s meaning.”  Philosophers argue that we discover facts through science, but faith? He wrote: “Faith operates beyond facts. Faith is an adventure, pushing us between comfort and discomfort, from the known to the unknown.” The scientific mind rebels against faith, even as faith makes life more pleasant.

Dr. Alan L. Mittleman, in his 2024 book Absurdity, and Meaning in Contemporary Philosophy and Jewish Thought, takes this idea further. Mittleman shows how Judaism, just like philosophy, grapples with deep doubts and perplexities. Instead of shutting down conversation, Judaism promotes dialogue. We dispel meaninglessness when we engage and when we question the world around us.

As Jews, we are particularly attuned to absurdity, perhaps because of our history – never setting down roots for too long, always somewhat on the periphery of mainstream society. We’ve kept our humor intact, even in dark times. Yet, in Judaism, the punchline is different. We cling to three words that change everything: faith, hope, and love.

Each day you rise in gratitude is an act of faith. Each Jewish child born is a protest of hope. Every mundane act is a demonstration of love. Because of these truths, Judaism cares less about what we accomplish and more about who we are. We aren’t merely like Sisyphus, endlessly pushing rocks up a mountain. Instead, how we live—how we carry our burdens, whether trudging or dancing—expresses our faith, hope, and love for life. That is how we contend with absurdity. That is my connection to God.

God’s expectation? God expects us to live as an expression of love, with reason, intelligence, and compassion, for the sake of a future we may never know.

These are times when embracing our Jewishness may seem absurd to some. We are, after all, a people who are often hated. In Nazi Germany, no Esther was able to avert the decree. Eighty years later, after October 7, there was a wellspring of anti-Semitism yet again.

In 2024, or 5785, Jew-hatred persists. In the three months after Hamas attacked Israel, anti-Semitic acts in the United States rose by 360%. Anti-Semitism is increasing most rapidly among young people. The old tropes and groundless conspiracy theories have taken on new life. All Jews are now viewed as oppressors, not the oppressed. According to the ADL nearly half of Americans believe Jews are irritating, dishonest in business, and have too much power in the United States. And we know this to be absurd.

Absurdity permeates political discourse. Today we face war when there is enough land for peaceful coexistence. You know the region I’m speaking about. The greatest number of displaced people due to war is . . . Sudan. What was the last time you saw protestors blocking the Brooklyn Bridge over the war in Sudan?  Absurd!

Or the gay, Jewish Americans calling out “from the river to the sea” without acknowledging that the Arabs who coined that phrase have no room for them as gay, Jewish, or American.

Or Marjorie Taylor Green, congresswoman from Georgia, who recently said “they control the weather.”

Or Ta Nehisi Coates’ book “The Message”, in which he portrays Israel’s treatment of Palestinians as a moral crime, without ever mentioning the history, Hamas, and denying the right of a Jewish State to exist.

Or those Israelis who think they can build walls, knock down houses, and confiscate land to create safe homes for themselves. Yes, Jews can add to the absurdity of this world.

And in a month, people who fear that Jews are imperiled and not powerful might have a Jewish first gentleman in the White House and a Jewish Majority leader in the Senate.

So why draw attention to ourselves when there are so many like Haman who want to destroy us? Why do the members of this tribe double down on this religion? Why would any member of the tribe want to stay in this club?

Because being Jewish transcends the absurdity of life. On our holidays, Judaism affirms human redemption (Yom Kippur), holy insurrection (Passover), and happiness in freedom (Sukkot). The world remains absurd, but our survival and hopefulness defy absurdity and surpass comedy.

Yom Kippur and Purim challenge us to decide: can life’s absurdity inspire courage and faith to make a better future?

Judaism teaches us to stand up for morality. We begin with ourselves. through self-reflection and self-criticism. This is the purpose of Yom Kippur—to infuse meaning into our Jewish identity by railing against the absurdity of hate and oppression, starting with our souls. The purpose of Purim is to connect with Esther’s courage. Like Esther, we must work to change the world because each human being is worthy of a better world.

We Jews, who see miracles in the mundane, and who create solace from sorrow, can rebuild a broken world that seems inextricably broken. We are the legacy of Esther, affirmed on Yom Kippur. We stand proudly as Jews, defying absurdity.

In a world increasingly plagued by uncertainty and chaos, it is easy to feel disoriented, detached, and even lost. Life may seem absurd, and faith may seem meaningless, but I live my life proudly and loudly as – a Jew—a beacon against absurdity and meaninglessness. My Judaism stands as a profound counterforce, a bulwark against madness, offering a framework, direction, and resilience in the face of a chaotic world.

Shabbat, for instance, is a profound response to the chaos of the workweek. This weekly practice offers a powerful reminder that, even in a seemingly irrational world, we can create sacred moments. Kiss your mezuzah when you enter your home in gratitude for a safe place to live, eat in a sukkah next week in recognition of the fragility of this world, show up in support of the hostages as one of the greatest mitzvot in our tradition, and support Jewish-based charities as tzedakah is the easiest way to improve this world.

Rather than resigning ourselves to despair, rather than unceasingly pushing that same rock up that same hill each day, Judaism transcends the absurd. We acknowledge the irrational and the unjust but respond with a commitment to justice, mercy, and hope.

For me, Judaism is a daily declaration that I matter, you matter, and the world matters. This is my expression of hope, my declaration of faith, and my promise to future generations: being Jewish can and will matter—for you even when the world is filled with absurdity.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

 

There’s a TED talk that begins with a story—a tale of a transatlantic flight, where a couple heads to a vacation in Scandinavia. Suddenly, turbulence strikes! The plane dips and sways, and from the back, a band of teens erupts in joyful whoops, as if riding a roller coaster of the skies.

But then, the turbulence escalates—an even more abrupt drop! Ceiling panels tremble, wires hang like vines in a storm, and dust clouds the air. Fear grips the hearts; some weep, some pray. The captain’s voice cuts through the chaos: “Please stay calm! This aircraft is structurally secure and built to endure far greater turbulence!” And yet, as the plane steadies, the TED talk speaker shares a truth that resonates deep within: she no longer feels safe flying. Her husband, however, marvels at the craft’s resilience. Same facts, different conclusions.

There is a lesson here about perception! From one unfortunate episode, from the same set of facts, we can be filled with dread or awe. Will we tremble at the turbulence or lift our eyes in wonder? Both reactions spring from the same experience. Neither is wrong!

Our responses are shaped by our histories, our personalities, our very beings.

Some might call this “confirmation bias”—the tendency to see what we wish to see, to cling to our beliefs while dismissing the contrary. But I stand here today, my friends, to speak of a greater truth—a truth about the turbulent times that we navigate, particularly when it comes to Israel.

I was a history major in college, I went to law school, got a master’s in taxation and then smicha as a rabbi.  None of these qualify me to speak about the geopolitics of the Middle East. I am just barely qualified to discuss the moral and ethical dilemma of the last year of war. And to those of you who think you know my position on Israel, . . . I haven’t settled on a position. Like many of you, I have teetered on the see-saw of emotions – crying for our Israeli sisters and brothers, lamenting the Palestinian suffering.

If I did not speak of Israel, it would be rabbinic malpractice! And if you squirm in your seats, I invite you to take a breath. I tried to chose words steeped in our rich, complex Jewish tradition. I stand here only qualified to ponder the moral and ethical dilemmas we face. Like many of you, I have wavered on this see-saw of emotion—grieving for our Israeli sisters and brothers, lamenting the suffering of Palestinians.

Indeed, we have all endured a year of turbulence, wrestling with the events since October 7. While some wish to turn away, others strive to remain informed. Some focus on the dread and others are filled with awe. Yet we are all on this same flight, navigating through the storm, our biases tethering us to certain truths, while others slip away.

The Torah teaches us that we may defend ourselves against those who wish to harm us. Leviticus 26:7 declares, “Your army shall give chase to your enemies, and they shall fall before you by the sword.” The Talmud confirms that if enemies besiege you, even on Shabbat, you may act to protect your life.

Yet, Proverbs 24:17 warns, “If your enemy falls, do not exult; if he trips, let your heart not rejoice.” There is no moral equivalence in mourning the loss of life, Jewish life, Christian life, Bedouin life, or Arab life, the life of my beloveds, and the lives of my enemies.

We are reminded in the Midrash: as the Egyptians drown in the sea, the angels wish to sing, but the Lord rebukes them, saying, “My creations are drowning, and you are singing before me?” We, too, must not rejoice in the downfall of any person, for we all descend from one person, Adam, one source, God.

And God is not gladdened by death; God mourns with us.

These have been horrific days October 7, October 8, October 9, October 10, and — days that have stretched into sorrow, loss, and continued suffering, for Israel and for its adversaries.

We must attack before we are struck, yes! Israel must push back evil from its borders. But we must also pray for the wicked to change, not to perish. We cannot sing while God’s children are lost to violence, bullets and bombs.

Jewish tradition is asking: Can you hold both ideas simultaneously?  Can you both be afraid of flying while marveling at the technology that allows planes to fly safely?  Can you support a secure Israel without encouraging excessive violence to human life?

Jewish tradition asks us: can we hold these two competing truths together in our minds and hearts? Can we support a secure Israel while advocating for the sanctity of life? The first anniversary of the October 7 attack approaches, and with it, commemorations and demonstrations worldwide. What will be our goal? Revenge or reconciliation? Or something in between.

In the space between awe for God’s creation and fear of man’s capacity for evil, comes Morality. Morality is complex. Morality requires both courage and compassion.

During the American Revolutionary War, the patriots deployed techniques learned from the Native Americans – what we now refer to as guerilla warfare. Subterfuge, ambush, and stealth wore down the British. Guerilla war demoralizes the enemy and gives the radical self-ascribed moral standing.

In the twentieth century and now twenty-first century, terrorism is the continuation of politics by brutal means. The tools of war eveloved. The processes of war changed.

Terrorists flew planes into buildings. Terrorists use gliders to cross border walls and rockets to decimate homes.

As Carl von Clausewitz, a political observer and moralist, would say “war is nothing but the continuation of politics with other means.” As the world became accustomed to terrorism, Clausewitz would describe terrorism as another political tool.

The Palestinian liberation movement and Muslim extremists embraced worldwide terrorism as their politics of choice. They too claimed moral superiority and declared terrorism as a moral duty.  Americans did it to fight the British. Jews did it to gain control over Palestine.

Judaism advises that morality should dictate our path. Our tradition favors peace over violence, and co-existence over war. Psalm 34 calls us to “Seek peace and pursue it.”

Yet, we should not forget that the right to self-defense is a moral imperative, too. We must balance the sanctity of life with the right to defend one’s self. If we believe in the sanctity of life, then Israel must defend itself.

Chicago-born writer G.P. Gottlieb has written, “You are morally right to wish for a Palestinian state that recognizes Israel and seeks peaceful coexistence … It’s ethically caring to wish that Israel kills only Hamas militants and Hezbollah fighters — and the world is right to be upset about the deaths of ALL innocent civilians

“But you are morally bankrupt if you don’t demand that Hamas return all hostages. You are morally bankrupt if you don’t demand the eradication of the Hamas terror regime, which began this war …  with the horrifying and barbaric massacre of 1200+ babies, children, women, and elderly, and the kidnapping of over 240 civilians. [And you are] especially [morally bankrupt] because the Hamas charter …advocates the … destruction of Israel and the death or expulsion of all its Jews.”

Moral equivalency invalidates rights and obligations, Moral equivalency adds to the anguish and suffering of people.

To those who only speak of Israel’s moral obligations, or speak of Palestinian suffering,

To those who speak only of Israeli anguish or who speak only of Palestinian terror,

Both Jewish law, and a moral universe, say that there is no “only.”  There is no “only.”

We all have access to the same facts, but our perspectives naturally narrow. We are all flying on the same plane.  Some favor awe for the miracle of flying. Others are filled by dread. But there will be bumpy flights and some accidents.  And there will be more travel, nervous flights, to vacations and family visits. There is no “only.

I stand here proud to advocate for Israel—my heritage, our future. I weep for the Palestinian lives lost, for my Jewish tradition demands compassion. Both truths can coexist. Both must coexist.

I can disapprove of the current Israeli government while decrying the evil of Hamas and Hezbollah. Both are valid.

I can advocate for peace while pressing Congress to provide weapons to Israel. Both are necessary!

So let us be sensitive to our choices. Let us support Israel’s right to defend itself without celebrating lost lives. This, my friends, is our Jewish tradition—a call to morality when the way is not clear. When it seems like the ceiling is caving, and the journey is fraught that is the time to sense both the dread and the awe.

May the One who makes peace in the heavens bring peace to our world. May we safeguard those under attack, protect the vulnerable, soften the hearts of the warlike, and strengthen those who defend the innocent

And as I lament the loss of good and blameless souls, I stand proud, declaring with all my heart, Od Yavo Shalom, There will be peace.

In the pandemic years, we witnessed significant changes in how Jews gather to pray. It has been most evident in how we utilize television and live streaming to pray from the comfort of our homes. One notable example is the Central Synagogue’s services, featuring the esteemed Rabbi Angela Buchdahl, a top-rated Jewish “program.” The impact of these professional and meaningful offerings on Jewish prayer is profound, both as a blessing and a challenge.

Technology influences our connections within our communities. The pandemic forced many of us into confinement at home and seeking solace, we turned to electronic media.

Synagogues have sought to make services accessible long before the pandemic. Adas Israel, in Washington, DC, pioneered this approach, broadcasting services on the radio. Such broadcasts aimed to accommodate those who were ill or elderly and couldn’t attend in person.

The Romemu community in New York championed Zoom and live-streamed services before Covid. Their approach respected virtual participants, offering a membership category for internet participants. Romemu elevated the technological approach to prayer, making the experience more personal and highly professional.

Zoom provided life cycle event connections for a Shiva minyan or a bar/bat mitzvah service. It also allowed smaller communities to sustain daily minyans. Zoom services welcomed individuals who couldn’t previously participate in communal prayer. There are compelling reasons to support a Zoom minyan.

Yet, fulfillment of your prayer obligations was not through electronic media. Ten people had to attend to complete a prayer service minyan. Then Covid happened. Progressive segments of the Jewish community accepted remote participation. Progressive Judaism already tends to emphasize the individual’s needs. Accordingly, virtual presence was equivalent to in-person participation.

The idea of remote participation expands upon Jewish law. The Talmud teaches that synagogues must have windows to connect worshippers with the outside world and allow those outside to join the service. Similarly, Mishnah Rosh Hashanah teaches us that hearing the shofar outside a synagogue fulfills the obligation. This inclusivity aligns with the spirit of live stream services.

A person standing near windows or doors to the prayer space, with visible eye contact, could be counted as part of the minyan. Another source even suggests that ten people standing in a field, able to see and hear one another, constitute a minyan. If someone standing outside a window can be counted, why not include those in a Zoom room participating in a service?

Should online services relieve us of the obligation to gather physically as a community? Or we must ask ourselves: do the benefits of a Zoom minyan outweigh the tradition of gathering in person?

The Conservative Movement’s Committee on Law and Standards (CLS) has questioned the continued use of the Zoom minyan. They suggest it should be limited to emergencies, such as a pandemic or natural disaster.

Psychologically speaking, they might be right. Words can offer comfort, and voices can provide support, but they cannot replace the touch of a hand, a hug, or physical presence. Those who cannot be touched, whose hands we cannot shake, whose smile we cannot see, remain alone.

The pandemic taught us that isolation can cause harmful loneliness. Technology rescued us from seclusion but did not fully replace the warmth of human connection.

The best forum for fostering connection is in the spiritual setting. You may sit in a theater with a crowd of people, but you aren’t forming a community. You can attend a sporting event, but a gathering of fans won’t satisfy your need for meaningful relationships. As social as pickleball and book clubs may be, I’m not sure such leisure activities create significant personal connections.

Jewish tradition understands the profound spiritual significance of coming together face to face, heart to heart. When gathering for a life cycle ritual or a holiday service, we have the opportunity for something profound to happen. We are meant to be present, share our joys and sorrows, and support one another on life’s journey.

Don’t mistake the convenience of online participation for spiritual fulfillment. The crisis of loneliness still looms over our society.

Through simple yet profound acts of connection, we can heal the wounds of isolation that plague our world. If not for yourself, your sense of loneliness your physical participation may be a blessing to someone else who needs more personal relationships.

We must reaffirm our commitment to one another and the idea that our faith communities are not just places of worship but sanctuaries of love and fellowship. We must be beacons of light in a world that sometimes feels dark and disconnected.

Despite the technological allure leading to isolation,  God’s presence is most powerful when we come together as a community. The spirit of unity and togetherness is a testament to our shared humanity, and it is through these connections that we find God’s love. In an age of screens and gadgets, we must remember that God and not the internet is the connection between people.

Let’s prioritize gathering in person, not just for religious purposes, but for the sake of ourselves and the well-being of our neighbors. It is in these connections that we find strength, hope, and the ability to overcome the crisis of loneliness that plagues our society.

While technology can connect us across distances, it cannot replace the power of physical presence and the warmth of human touch. We must balance embracing modern tools and upholding the traditions and values that have sustained us for generations.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

Today, as we gather on this sacred day of Yom Kippur, we come together to reflect on the profound theme of forgiveness. It is a day when we focus on seeking forgiveness from God and from those we may have wronged. We examine our actions and ask for pardon with a sense of urgency in our hearts. Yet, there is one aspect of forgiveness that often remains elusive, and that is the act of forgiving ourselves. This is the type of forgiveness with which I struggle the most.

In our tradition, we are no strangers to acknowledging our wrongdoings. From the earliest days of our faith, we have been guided by a set of moral principles and teachings that remind us of what we should not have done. We dedicate these 25 hours of Yom Kippur to introspection, where we meticulously examine our missteps and errors. It’s almost as if we are experts in identifying our own flaws and shortcomings.

But amid all this reflection and repentance, there lies a crucial foundation within our tradition, one that prevents us from sinking into a bottomless pit of self-loathing. That foundation is the concept of forgiveness.

Today, I want to address a struggle that many of us face—the difficulty of forgiving ourselves. We often find it easier to point out our own faults and to engage in self-criticism. We replay our mistakes in our minds, tormenting ourselves with feelings of regret and self-loathing.

Judaism, however, offers us a more constructive alternative to self-destructive tendencies. These High Holidays provide us with a roadmap for recognizing our mistakes, resolving to improve ourselves, and requesting forgiveness. As human beings, we are inherently imperfect. We stumble, fall, and make mistakes—it’s an integral part of our journey towards becoming better individuals.

We must not forget that we are deserving of forgiveness’s embrace. Our tradition emphasizes not only seeking forgiveness from God but also from one another. Forgiving others and accepting their forgiveness is an affirmation of our equality. It acknowledges our shared humanity, our shared capacity for error, and our shared potential for growth.

Leviticus 19:18 instructs us to “Love your neighbor as yourself.” This commandment underscores the importance of self-love. To truly love others, we must first learn to forgive ourselves for being imperfect. It’s a reminder that self-love is not only permissible but imperative.

Often, when we face challenges or fears, our past mistakes flood our minds. We wrestle with our imperfect selves, much like Jacob wrestled with the angel. Jacob, too, was a complex figure with a blend of imperfections and divine qualities. In the end, he forgave himself and his failings, accepting himself as both flawed and inspired. It was only then that he could reengage with the world with courage, hope, and integrity.
Wrestling with our mistakes is the path to personal growth. We must recognize that we are not born perfect, all-wise, all-skilled, and all-loving. Accepting our humanity and forgiving ourselves for our mistakes is the key to growth.

We often spend more time berating ourselves for our errors than anyone else ever would. We fill our minds with negative thoughts, convincing ourselves that we are not smart enough, strong enough, or good enough. The loudest voice in our heads is often self-destructive.

But it’s time to let go of guilt, shame, and regret. It’s time to release the “should haves” and “maybes” and focus on what we will do and achieve. We are more than the sum of our mistakes. As Bryan Stevenson aptly put it, “Each of us is more than the worst thing we have ever done.”

In a world increasingly dominated by cancel culture, where our mistakes are magnified and used to define us, we must remember that we are better than any failure or mistake. Our mistakes are not our identities; they are opportunities to learn and grow.

So, how do we embark on the journey of self-forgiveness? It starts with admission and recognition of our lapses. Speak your feelings aloud, share your burdens with someone you trust, and give your mind a rest from incessant self-criticism.

Adopt a mantra, a positive phrase that reminds you that mistakes do not define you. Be proactive in making choices that disprove your worst thoughts about yourself. Believe in your capacity to become the best version of yourself.

Ultimately, healing and self-forgiveness will not only benefit you but also enhance your capacity to connect with others. When we let go of self-loathing, we can embrace humility, acknowledging our fallibility and opening ourselves to better relationships.

Life is a journey, and along the way, we will make mistakes and falter. But remember, to live life fully is to accept yourself. To accept yourself is to forgive yourself for being human. There is always room for improvement and growth, but acceptance means learning from mistakes and returning stronger than before.
In the end, self-forgiveness is not just a gift we give ourselves, but it’s also a gift we give to the world. When we forgive ourselves, we can love ourselves, and that love spills over, making us more capable of loving others.

So, as we strive towards forgiveness during these High Holidays, don’t forget to forgive yourself. Heal your wounds, embrace your vulnerabilities, and believe in your ability to become the best version of yourself. For in forgiveness, we find not only redemption but also the capacity to love and be loved.

May this Yom Kippur be a day of self-forgiveness, healing, and renewal for each of us. And may we emerge from it with the strength, resolve, and optimism to make the most of each God-given day.
Amen.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

The key concept of Rosh Hashanah may be the willingness to sacrifice. What do you have that you would sacrifice? What are you willing to sacrifice? Money, Time, Individualism? For whom are you ready to sacrifice? For your family, your community, the Jewish people?

Abraham is the focus of the Torah reading for Rosh Hashanah. Abraham left Babylonia. He sacrificed his home and his independence to an unknown God and an unseen promised land. Then God tested Abraham him.  Was Abraham willing to sacrifice his son Isaac? God gave the command. Abraham obeyed. Abraham took his only child to Mt. Moriah with wood and firestarter. Some sages taught that Abraham demonstrated absolute faith in his willingness to sacrifice his son.

While studying at the Hartman Institute in Jerusalem this summer, Micah Goodman offered some thoughts on the concept of sacrifice.  He began with a census. In Exodus 30:11 in the Torah, a census was taken and a half shekel payment was paid as redemption for each person counted. Without the half shekel, there would be a plague.

Centuries later, King David ordered a census with disastrous results. As King, David laid the foundations of a nation. He had waged wars and united the tribes. David made Israel a nation just like the other nations, militaristic and subduing their own people.

To succeed in conquest, a King needed to count the available soldiers. The King needed to count the farms and farmers to know how much grain and animals the King could take.  To build a monarchy, a King counted the people, not as unique and precious, but as sources of power and wealth.

In II Samuel 24:1, the story of King David takes a turn. “The anger of the LORD again flared up against Israel; and He incited David against them, saying, “Go and number Israel and Judah.” David knows the danger of taking a census. Yet, David follows God’s command and orders a census to be conducted.

After the census, the prophet Gad approaches. Three punishments are proposed, a three-month rout by Israel’s enemies, a seven-year famine, or a plague. Each of these will hurt multitudes of people. Ultimately, God sent a plague that killed 70,000.

Judaism rejects the world where census taking reduces people to mere numbers. The role of Judaism is to tell the world that each person is precious. Each is created in the image of God, each as valuable as a world unto herself. The nations of the ancient world subjugated people and dehumanized them with submission, conscription, and slavery. Judaism rejects power structures that diminish humanity.

As Rabbi Jonathan Saks wrote: “The numbering of a people is the most potent symbol of mankind-in-the-mass, of a society in which the individual is not valued in and for him- or herself but as part of a totality whose power lies in numbers.”  Israel should be a nation of priests not a list of numbers. God offers love to people whose strength has nothing to do with numbers; God cares for people, not empires.

After the plague began, an angel of destruction approached Jerusalem.  David cried out to God. “I alone am guilty, I alone have done wrong; but these poor sheep, what have they done? Let Your hand fall upon me!” David offered himself as the sacrifice needed to stop the plague. David was willing to sacrifice himself for his people.

God heard David’s offer and stopped the plague. David was told to offer sacrifice to God on the threshing floor of a Jebusite’s farm. The sages say that the threshing floor became the location of the Temple, built by David’s son Solomon. This story again links back to where we started, with Abraham and Isaac at Mount Moriah. Mount Moriah too is the location of Jerusalem.

Abraham was asked to sacrifice his son and promptly did so. He only stops when the angel stays Abraham’s hand.

David took a census despite the risk. He failed this test. David is unprepared for the sacrifice to come. Of his people, his flock, 70,000 died.

Abraham is steadfast in his obedience. David is vacillating between his duty to God and his control of the nation.

Then, David offered himself as a sacrifice to stop the plague. Perhaps he realized that the monarchy had the potential to replace Judaism with the worship of power. Maybe he repented his role in creating an unholy kingdom. His atonement was to lay the foundation for the Temple to be built in Jerusalem.

Judaism boils down to three locations: Eden, Sinai, and Jerusalem.  Eden is the creation of the world. Sinai is the revelation of God’s word. Jerusalem is the promised land’s capital. And then we hope for a messianic time, which is the return to Eden. The loop is closed.

The “Jerusalem” has its foundation in the stories of Abraham and Isaac and David and the census.  The ideal of Jerusalem is the spine that holds Judaism together. Jerusalem is not just a city. It is a religious archetype. Jerusalem represents the land promised to Abraham by God for the treasured people saved from slavery by God. Torah commanded we create a place for God, a Bet HaMikdash, a Temple, ultimately built in Jerusalem. There was established a place of sacrifice where Abraham would have sacrificed Isaac.  Where King David sacrificed to stop a plague. Sacrifice in Jerusalem was the operating system of Judaism. Jerusalem represents the willingness to sacrifice for God.

Does sacrifice continue to be an essential part of the Jewish experience? Judaism demands sacrifices, sacrifices of your time, your earnings, and your independence. We sacrifice time to prayer and to rituals. We sacrifice our money, to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, care for the widow, and care for the orphan.  We sacrifice our independence as we are not complete as people without our attachment to the Jewish community. We are intertwined, all Israel responsible for one another.

Micah Goodman, whose lecture initiated this discussion, fears that sacrifice is no longer at the core of Jewish identity. What becomes of Judaism when we no longer sacrifice time to prayer and rituals? What becomes of people when we fail to care about each other’s needs? What becomes of Judaism, without a willingness to sacrifice some of our independence in exchange for Jewish connection and identification?

The system of Jewish worship was built on sacrifices. The offering of animals, incense, or foodstuffs demonstrated devotion in the ancient world. With the destruction of the Temple in the Roman era, sacrifice was replaced with a complex system of Tefilah, Teshuvah, and Tzedakah – prayer, repentance, and charity.  Prayer, repentance, and charity all require personal sacrifice.

Meanwhile, modernity, wealth accumulation, and individualism are blessings that improve our lives and curses in Judaism’s view of the ideal world.

Modernity steals time from spiritual development to economic growth. The computer age, the internet age, the information age, and the virtual reality age provide compelling alternatives to spiritual life and ritual observances. Most people are not willing to sacrifice television for a day of rest.

Wealth is idolized, and poverty is increasing. Rich nations take from poor countries. Wealth is concentrated in relatively few people. Our government is a plutocracy, rewarding special interests with money and power. Meanwhile, we are unable to sacrifice a little of our wealth to end poverty or cure disease. Judaism requires tithing and tzedakah to meet everyone’s needs. We can afford to end poverty in the United States by providing a universal basic income. The estimated cost to end poverty is $175 Billion.  The military costs about $800 Billion. We choose to have poverty in the United States because we are unwilling to sacrifice our advantages for the sake of the many who are hungry today.

Individualism is a thinly veiled egotism.  We sanctify individual rights as God-given and sacred. Yet, the elevation of individual rights is often recast as individuals choosing themselves over the collective.  That individualism is born of nihilism and narcissism. Jews are selecting the “me” over the “we” are preferring the “I” to the “us.” We won’t sacrifice any of our independence for our religion or people’s sake.

My teacher, Micah Goodman, was chiefly concerned about Israel. Modern Israel was founded on a willingness to sacrifice life, wealth, and independence for a safe homeland for the Jewish people. That was Zionism! Devotion to Zion is eroding in Israel.  Groups of Israelis are forcing the government to serve their needs without regard for the nation or the Jewish people. For example, the ultra-Orthodox in Israel are insulated from army service while receiving inordinate Government subsidies for their communities.  Meanwhile, reservists, alarmed at the Government’s recent actions, will cease to serve the nation. The willingness to sacrifice for Israel is fading fast.

On Yom Kippur, we offer a martyrology service about rabbis who died for Judaism.  The martyred sages call to us through the ages. They are asking, what would you sacrifice for Judaism, for the sake of the Jewish people, for a Jewish future? Save your lives, . . but are you willing to give of your time, wealth, and independence?

When you have what to die for, you have something to live for.  Judaism has given the world a legacy of hope. Judaism affirms the inherent value of each human being. Our religion is a testament to the value of freedom and to human rights. Judaism speaks to the dignity of each person.

Fewer are willing to sacrifice for Judaism. People are unplugged from religious life and plugged into their devices. Perhaps we fear failing the test – as God tested Abraham and King David. Perhaps we are protective of ourselves, fearful that we don’t have enough time, enough resources, enough freedom.

The challenge for 5784 is to ask ourselves are we willing to sacrifice for Judaism, for the Jewish people, and for a Jewish future. Are we able to show our children and grandchildren, nieces, and nephews, that there is great value in giving time, wealth, and identity to being Jewish.

Judaism is about living in service of something greater than yourself.  If you live not according to God’s voice but to your own voice, you will be paralyzed within your ego, fearful, bored, lonely. The key is to find balance, balance between your devotion to the greater cause represented by Judaism and self-preservation. A life consumed only with your needs is not a life well lived.  A life only about yourself is imbalanced. A life lived only about yourself is unfulfilled. May this be a year in which you find the balance, recognizing the value in sacrifice that is the foundation of Judaism.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

Dear fellow clergy, distinguished guests, my neighbors,

Today, I want to reflect on how we, as a community, Christian and Jewish and Muslim, Black and White, all cherish the place called Zion.

In our traditions, Zion is a mountain in Jerusalem. Zion is where we built a structure worthy of God. Zion’s rocky edges and stone paths all glisten with the divine light of God’s love.

Zion is the place God chose to inspire us, radiating the divine light that illuminates our path. It beckons us to improve ourselves and our world. Zion’s light penetrates the cracks that are our imperfections, unseals our closed eyes, and warms our cold hearts.

Each week in synagogues, Jews read a portion of the Torah, the five books of Moses, a source of wisdom and inspiration. As we remove the Torah from its ark, we chant, “Ki Mitziyon Teytze Torah” – from Zion comes learning. From Zion comes law. From Zion comes Godliness.

When we seek Zion, we seek God. When we seek Zion, we strive to spread Godliness through our words and actions. Our pursuit of Zion aligns with the goodness that God intends for all humanity. It reminds us that we lead by our example, sharing the divine values of compassion, justice, and equality.

In Potomac, we have our own place which is Zion, the Scotland AME Zion Church. Four years have passed since flooding waters ravaged the church. The waters engulfed the building.  But God is greater than the raging waters. As the Psalmist taught us, the waters will pass, and God remains with us. And now we, all of us, together, must rebuild the church.

Why is rebuilding this place a joint effort? I turn to the Jewish philosopher Franz Rosenzweig. Rosenzweig understood the basis of our religions to be the ongoing revelation of God’s message. God’s words are not history. They are verses that continue to reverberate throughout the ages, speaking to us even today, every day. This understanding holds great significance for both Judaism and Christianity. As God continues to speak, it is our responsibility to listen attentively. To listen to God is to respond faithfully.

God asks us to pursue Zion. To seek Zion is to create a world where the Divine word, revelation, is heard and cherished above all else. A world unblemished by racism and antisemitism. A world free of poverty and defilement, greed and pride, hatred, and inequality.

Through our shared experiences, we must develop empathy and understanding for each other’s struggles. This empathy can motivate us to stand up against all forms of prejudice and bigotry. This understanding compels us to care for each other’s spiritual homes as if they were our own.

Our mutual traditions emphasize justice, fairness, and respect for all human beings. As we all respond to the call to build and rebuild Zion, we dismantle the barriers that separate us.

American ideals, Christian morals, and Jewish principles have endured and continue to endure despite the hatred that persists in our country. Racism and anti-Semitism are twin children of an evil ancestor born out of ignorance and prejudice. Good people have the power to combat these hateful ideologies. We must combine social action with inner spiritual work, building with the bricks of our humanity, and assembling a community in a place called Zion.

Let us engage in open dialogue, educate ourselves and others, and actively participate in efforts to create a more inclusive and equitable society. Let us be advocates for righteousness. Let us be neighbors and friends. Let us rebuild Zion in our own community.

The psalmist wrote, by the waters of Babylon, we sat down, and we wept as we remembered Zion. Today I sing a new song, by the waters that ruined the Scotland AME Zion Church, we do not sit and weep, but we rebuild Zion.

May the ongoing revelation of God’s words guide us on this journey, illuminating our path and inspiring us to create together a world that reflects the light of Zion. May God bless us with the strength, wisdom, and compassion to eradicate racism and hatred. And together, may we create a renewed Zion.

In honor of Juneteenth,

June 18, 2023

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

The promise of freedom is at the heart of the Passover seder. Freedom is not merely the liberation from slavery but goes to the quality of our lives. This year, challenges to freedom plague our world and our people. Will your seder stick only to the 3,500-year-old story or fast forward to the present-day reality?

Ultimately, Passover directs us toward freedom. I doubt that the final phase of the Exodus has been reached if democracy in the promised land is in peril. We who love Israel are concerned about its recent descent toward autocracy.

Perhaps the most dangerous part of Netanyahu’s power grab is the rupture in Israeli society. Most concerning to me is that the hiloni (secular Israelis) are feeling disenfranchised. These are the men and women who defend Israel in the Army and are now hesitating to show up for reserve duty. Others are contemplating leaving Israel. Is Moses’ mission a failure if leading our people out of slavery to freedom brings us to an undemocratic Israel?

The persistent hope of the Exodus story is at the seder’s end when we say, “Next year in Jerusalem.”  Jerusalem may no longer represent our hopes for human rights and freedom.

From a distance, we have supported Israel when under attack. We have yearned for a resolution to the conflict with the Palestinians. But we have not yet dealt with the prospect of an undemocratic Israel.

Jews have been praying for a return to Israel, as a place of refuge, hope, and freedom for Jews. Today, our prayers must turn to protect the democratic Israel we love.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

The morning in Selma, Alabama was extremely foggy. It was hard to see the Alabama river below the bridge into town. We turned off the bridge onto Water Street. Stepping down from the bus, we entered one of the old brick buildings along the waterfront. And then the day slowly began to clear.

Selma had recently been in the news. An F-2 tornado touched down in January devastating parts of the city. But that was not why this group of rabbis came to town. Selma has another dark and stormy history spanning centuries. Selma is emblematic of a small Southern segregated city.

We stood on Water Street, just a few dozen feet away from the spot where boats would dock. For decades, this is where slaves arrived in Selma.

After the Civil War, Southern states denied their African American citizens’ basic human rights. In 1896 the Supreme Court affirmed laws that gave separate but equal treatment to Blacks. Of course, in practice, these laws denied Blacks their rights to a good education, equal access to government services, or participation in commerce. Chief among these rights is the right to vote. Through various restrictions such as poll taxes and literacy tests, southern states were able to prevent Blacks from registering. By the 1950s, only two percent of Blacks in Selma could vote. For that reason, Selma became the focal point of the efforts to secure voting rights for Blacks.

Civil Rights leaders feared the backlash from attempts to desegregate Selma. Yet, Dr. Bernard Lafayette convinced the leadership to send him to Selma. His efforts laid the groundwork for the historic march from Selma to the state capital, Montgomery, Alabama. The only road to Montgomery required crossing a bridge named for a Confederate general and KKK leader. It took three attempts for the marchers to walk from the Brown Chapel AME Church over the Edmund Pettus Bridge. The first attempt was on March 7, 1965. Six hundred marchers were met with horrendous violence from the police and local men deputized for this purpose. It is known as Bloody Sunday in American history. The next week, with the support of Federal Troops, the marchers made it across the bridge on a five-day, fifty-mile trek to the capital, demanding voting rights.

My first steps in Selma were into the By the River Center for Humanity.  We met Sister Afriye We-kandodis who leads life-changing experiences. We sampled some of her soul work. In her presentation, she shared a belief that healing is achieved when we acknowledge the totality of the past. Our work is to love ourselves and overcome fear. Her healing techniques included sound, movement, and performance to achieve spiritual and emotional releases.

Picture this scene. Twenty white Jewish leaders in a wide circle, hugging themselves and screaming “I love myself.” With inspirational music blaring, many took turns dancing in the circle’s center with Afriye. Her faith was so strong, that all were swept up in the love, and fully engaged in the activity.

We later walked across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. The sunshine brushed aside the fog and cloudiness. We sang: “Kol Haolam Kulo Gesher Tzar M’od,” all the world is a narrow bridge. The main thing is not to fear. We walked quietly. Our steps followed the steps of civil rights heroes. We were walking on holy ground.

The challenge today is to keep walking across those bridges.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

The American South hosted Jewish immigrants hoping to live the American Dream. German Jews, Ashkenazi Jews, and Sephardic Jews all found refuge below the Mason-Dixon line. Yet, their American dream included the dual terrors of discrimination and segregation.

Jewish communities thrived throughout the South during times of Jim Crow segregation. They had cordial relationships with their Christian neighbors. Jews had retail businesses and relied upon White Christian customers.  And Jews of the South generally refrained from participation in the civil rights movement.

We learned more by visiting the only remaining synagogue in Selma. Temple Mishkan Israel stands on Broad Street in the heart of Selma, Alabama’s downtown. In 2023, there are three members remaining.  Not three families.  Three members.  We met with Ronnie Leet.  The meeting began with a video about the synagogue. The video was also a fundraising pitch. The building needs $5 million dollars of repairs. Leet argued for the preservation of the building as the only way to tell the story of Selma’s once-thriving Jewish community.

Of interest to our group was how Leet and his family viewed the Civil Rights Movement.  The Leet family watched from a distance. They had a retail store. Mr. and Mrs. Leet worked every day. They had long participated in society with their white Christian neighbors. The Leets feared upsetting those relationships. While his family may have been sympathetic to their Black neighbors, Civil Rights was not their fight. 

Ronnie Leet’s answer was direct and honest. Like the Leets, most of us focus on our families, our livelihoods, and our health. We might take interest in the news and donate to causes. Human nature is inclined toward stasis, even if the arc of the universe leans toward justice.

Jews believe in truth and justice. We celebrate freedom every Sabbath and every Passover. We helped Soviet Jews escape repression. But supporting Soviet Jews did not jeopardize our jobs. We were writing checks to help Israel on Yom Kippur in 1973. But supporting Israel did not imperil our families.

Some will argue that we have an obligation to our own people before we can help others. I might agree with that argument if we were a people of limited resources and limited power. But American Jews have more wealth and more power now than any Jewish people in over 2,000 years. Our place in America is secure, despite recent episodes of anti-semitism.

I don’t condemn the Selma Jewish community of the mid-twentieth century. They were afraid and fear motivates us to protect ourselves. Rather, I will focus on those who did show up, who funded civil rights campaigns, and who pressured their representatives to rectify the injustices of segregation.

The Southern Jewish communities are dwindling in size. Where there is racism, there is anti-semitism. Why would Jews continue to live and work where their futures are in peril?

While life for Jews in America has improved in the past sixty years, discrimination against African Americans continues. Jews might leave the South, but let’s not forget our fellow Americans who suffer bias and degradation.

Crossing from Georgia into Alabama on I-75, our group of rabbis entered the first rest stop. A large carved stone reads: “Alabama We Dare Defend Our Rights.” Alabaman’s defense of rights? Whose rights are these Alabamans daring to defend?  Is it the rights of its African American citizens? Or the state’s right to make laws that discriminate as each state sees fit?  The statement as displayed dares us to explore what rights are important to Alabama. Withhold judgment until you learn more.

For example, the issue of mass incarceration is on my mind. Alabama’s prisons are filled with African American inmates. Blacks are incarcerated at twice the rate of whites. My inclination is to condemn criminals for their behavior. But the statistics in Alabama make me question my judgment. Are all the people incarcerated contemptible? Such judgment fails to consider the circumstances that led to incarceration or the humanity of each imprisoned person. While Blacks are 25% of the state population, Black prisoners represent 50% of the total prison population. Is that attributable to an unfair legal system, perhaps? Bryan Stevenson of the Equal Justice Initiative says that “no one deserves to be judged solely by their worst moments and greatest failings.” My presumptions about the character of Alabama prisoners must be challenged.

Does the same approach to judging people by their greatest failings apply to others in Alabama? This question will come up when we meet Jewish Alabamans who refrain from the struggle for civil rights. Will I judge them solely by their moral failings? Spoiler alert, we met lovely Jews in Alabama who were apathetic or unmoved by the Civil Rights movement.

Perhaps the key to a civil rights mission to Alabama is to set judgment aside. Like Jello, there’s always room for judgment. But to gain understanding and wisdom, judgment should come at the conclusion of fact-finding, and deep listening to the concerns and perceptions of each person. My intention is to listen before I offer judgment.

We drive out of the rest stop and pass a ball field where a group is playing soccer. How similar this scene is to one I might see in Montgomery County, Maryland. I see children enjoying life despite the mess their ancestors have made of this world. They deserve a world where we are curious and concerned before we offer judgment.

Rabbi Evan Krame