Captive in an Egyptian prison, Joseph’s ability to interpret dreams became the key to his freedom. What dreams did Joseph have during those long, uncertain years of captivity? Will dreams sustain those held in chains of oppression or illness today?

וַיְהִ֕י מִקֵּ֖ץ שְׁנָתַ֣יִם יָמִ֑ים וּפַרְעֹ֣ה חֹלֵ֔ם וְהִנֵּ֖ה עֹמֵ֥ד עַל־הַיְאֹֽר׃

Parshat Miketz begins; “After two years, Pharaoh dreamed he was standing by the Nile.”

Joseph interpreted Pharaoh’s dreams, predicting seven years of abundance followed by seven years of famine. Impressed by his wisdom, Pharaoh elevated Joseph to a high position, entrusting him to oversee a plan that would save Egypt. Remarkably, Pharaoh placed his faith in an enslaved Hebrew with nothing more than a reputation for understanding dreams.

While Joseph rose to prominence, we must not forget the years he spent languishing in prison. The Torah notes that God was with Joseph during this time, yet the pain of his incarceration cannot be overlooked. What dreams sustained him? How did God bring him comfort in his darkest moments? The text raises unanswered questions about Joseph’s mental and emotional state—questions that resonate even today.

This episode brings to my mind two thoughts. The first is of the 100 or more captives currently held in Gaza. What dreams sustain them in their captivity? What comfort do they cling to? I think of the unimaginable mental health challenges they endure—loneliness, claustrophobia, anxiety, degredation, and heartbreak. What will it take to secure their release? What skills, actions, and faith must we muster?

This reflection extends beyond physical captivity. Many today feel imprisoned by illness, disability, or the limitations of aging. These challenges have been a focus of my life’s work. And now, my own mother is facing physical incapacity and has no hope of full recovery and relies on oxycodone for comfort. For people facing these struggles, life can resemble captivity. What dreams give them hope? What comfort best helps them persevere? When might they just give up?

If empathy for the imprisoned still feels distant, consider this: You, too, might face some form of captivity in your lifetime—whether it’s short-lived or prolonged. (Remember the Covid epidemic?) It might come in the form of illness, loss of freedom, or confinement to a circumstance beyond your control. To prepare for that moment, you can begin by advocating for those already captive—whether they are prisoners of terror, illness, or circumstance. Concrete actions that demonstrate your concern send a powerful message to the world: This is how we wish to be treated in our own moments of vulnerability. We care about each person held captive, whatever the nature of the prison. Advocate for patients’ rights, prison reform, or rail against the laggard Government of Israel what has not follow the Torah that demands we prioritize the safe return of captives.

What will your dreams be if you ever lose freedom of movement or choice? Now is the time to dream boldly about the world you value most and take action to secure those rights—not just for yourself, but for everyone around you.

The story of Joseph offers a dramatic arc: a young man thrown into a pit, held in prison, and ultimately elevated to the heights of Egyptian power. Its happy ending lifts us up. But today, I find myself grappling with endings that feel far from happy. I wrestle with the reality of imprisonment—whether it’s within a prison cell or within the confines of our imperfect bodies.

Without the certainty that God will bring me comfort or that a fairy-tale ending awaits, I turn to you. I seek solidarity, I invite action, and I dream of a day when all forms of captivity will dissolve—like a bad dream finally giving way to the morning light.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

I needed a guide for navigating difficult conversations. Comforting the grieving and ill is a mitzvah, but we have to be careful what we say to be helpful and not harmful. I thought of this analogy. We should be like a bowl of chicken soup: warm, nourishing, simple, made with love, and leaving room for more. Here’s what triggered my thinking on this topic.

What Not to Say: Lessons from Joseph’s Story

In the Torah, Joseph’s brothers sell him into slavery and then cover up their actions. They bring his bloodstained tunic to their father, saying:

“We found this. Please examine it; is it your son’s tunic or not?”

No assumption of fault and nearly no compassion can be found in their approach. The share bad news in the form of a question, a construct that places distance between those asking and those answering.  Why then would they ask their father to confirm what they already knew? Did they hope to soften the blow or avoid culpability? Either way, it’s an example of an abrupt and dishonest way to deliver bad news. And then,

Notice that only Jacob mourned for Joseph. No wonder he refused to be comforted by his sons and daughters, who did not actually mourn with him. They could not approach his grief and could not offer comfort.

From my own experiences—countless hospital visits and shiva calls —I’ve learned how to approach difficult moments thoughtfully. The key is to say little as described in Proverbs 18:27-28,

A knowledgeable person is sparing with his words;
A person of understanding is reticent.

Even a fool, if keeping silent, is deemed wise;
Intelligent, if he/she seals their lips.

14 Guidelines for Delivering Bad News

  1. Be direct. Don’t avoid the issue with euphemisms and platitudes. Say, “X is sick” or “Y has died.”
  2. Avoid empty questions. Instead of “How are you doing?”—which can feel trite and unanswerable — just acknowledge the reality (i.e. “this sucks”)
  3. Keep it simple. Jewish tradition gets it right: say little. Try something that acknowledges pain like: “what a blow,” or “This is so hard”.
  4. Don’t dig for details. Avoid questions about how or why the tragedy occurred. Focus on listening not playing detective.
  5. Skip immediate offers to help. Presence is more valuable than problem-solving at first.
  6. Hold off on logistics. Tasks like notifying others or organizing food can wait for an hour or two.
  7. Trust the medical team. Avoid questioning the medical care right away. It can stir doubts or guilt.
  8. Avoid distressing stories. Don’t share your anecdotes about painful experiences. It adds fear, not comfort.
  9. Be practical. Coordinate a meal train or a schedule of visitors without involving the grieving person.
  10. Keep your emotions in check. Don’t add your concerns or dread to their burden.
  11. Respect boundaries. Physical touch is not always welcome. Perhaps you can offer merely to hold a hand before initiating big physical touch like a hug.
  12. Plan for follow-ups. Say, “I’ll call on Thursday. You don’t have to answer but I’ll be available,” or “I’ll bake your favorite cookies. And keep them in the freezer.” Concrete and tangible actions matter when offered without obligation.
  13. Allow time. Grieving and healing can’t be rushed. Your continued presence over time is the best gift.
  14. Leave with assurance. End on a note of continued care and support. There is brilliance in the traditional phrase: “HaMakom Yinachem” – may you find comfort among all who grieve” It acknowledges their pain, and that they are not alone.

A Better Way to Care

Joseph’s brothers set a low bar for delivering bad news and comforting their father. We can do better when coming into the presence of someone who is coping with a crisis. Show up with a full heart, but not a full mouth. Speak less, listen more, and let your actions show your love.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

When getting a haircut recently, I shared my stress about the current state of our country, especially the radical elements. Post-election, the news has me worrying about my family’s well-being. Between snips, my stylist advised me to tune out the distressing headlines. “Just ignore it,” he said with a dismissive shrug. But his advice struck me as misguided. Ignoring the threatening elements of our nation feels dangerous, especially for vulnerable communities; Jews, Trans people, Blacks, and others. Willful ignorance enables hatred and emboldens vigilantes. Rather than withdraw, I want to face these anxieties with a plan.

This brings to mind a story from the Torah. When Jacob returns to Canaan after years away, he knows he must face his brother Esau, who once threatened to kill him. Jacob is understandably consumed by fear and anxiety: “Jacob was very afraid and distressed” (וַיִירָא יֲעֲקֹב מְאָד וַיֵצֶר לֹוֹ).

But Jacob does not allow his fear to paralyze him. Instead, he devises a plan. He divides his family, flocks, and herds into two camps, reasoning that if Esau attacks one, the other might escape. Later that evening, alone and wrestling with an angel, Jacob emerges from the encounter transformed, though he carries a limp as a reminder of the struggle.

The reunion between Jacob and Esau unfolds surprisingly peacefully. Esau embraces Jacob, seemingly letting go of his anger. Yet Jacob remains cautious, politely declining Esau’s invitation to live together and instead choosing a separate path. Though Esau’s intentions appear genuine, Jacob’s anxiety persists—a testament to how fear, whether real or imagined, shapes our perceptions and decisions.

Jacob’s story resonates deeply in today’s climate. His fear of Esau, rooted in past threats, mirrors the psychological insecurity many of us feel in uncertain times. For me, this insecurity stems from doubts about the dependability of my fellow “radicalized” Americans. Remember the shooting at the Tree of Life in Pittsburgh or the demonstrations in Charlottesville or the encampment at Columbia University? History reminds us to stay vigilant. Anti-Semitism has long existed in this country, and while we have not experienced something as catastrophic as Kristallnacht, recent surges in hate crimes and extremist rhetoric are alarming.

In times of heightened tension, comfort and security come from preparedness. Jacob’s response to his fear is instructive: he acknowledges his anxiety, devises a strategy, and takes steps to protect his family and resources. Ignoring one’s fears—as my stylist suggested—is not a viable solution for building safety or resilience.

Some may dismiss such caution as overreaction. After all, our nation has weathered storms of division before. Yet, insecurity is not purely rational; it’s an emotional response informed by history and the temperature of the times. For those of us in vulnerable communities, the stakes feel too high to simply “tune out” and hope for the best.

Like Jacob, I grapple with how to balance engagement with self-preservation. I want to be a cordial neighbor while maintaining vigilance and boundaries. For some, this might mean considering extreme measures like moving assets abroad or seeking refuge in another country. Others may find solace in local community-building or advocacy work. That is where I devote my energies. The paths vary, but the need for a plan remains constant.

Jacob’s story reminds us that fear can constrict our sense of judgment but also sharpen our instincts. His example encourages us to channel our anxieties into thoughtful preparation. In the face of uncertainty, we are called to protect what we value most while striving to create conditions for a safer, more equitable future.

Evan J. Krame, Rabbi

וַיִּשַּׁ֥ק יַעֲקֹ֖ב לְרָחֵ֑ל וַיִּשָּׂ֥א אֶת־קֹל֖וֹ וַיֵּֽבְךְּ׃
Then Jacob kissed Rachel and broke into tears.

The story of Jacob kissing Rachel at the well is a tale of divine destiny and human connection. However, viewed through the lens of modern sensibilities, this moment can provoke complex reactions, especially in an era of extreme polarization.

Jacob fled his home after deceiving his brother, Esau, and sought refuge with family in the east. Happening upon his cousin Rachel at a well for watering the herds, he kissed her. Today acts like touching, fondling, or kissing without explicit permission are classified as sexual assault—serious offenses with traumatic consequences. For many, Jacob’s impulsive act might appear as an unacceptable breach of personal boundaries. And yet, when read as part of a sacred text, Jacob’s kiss transcends its literal act, embodying deeper spiritual symbolism. Mystics interpret the gesture as a merging of divine masculine and feminine energies, a sacred channeling of cosmic balance.

Still, acknowledging the spiritual lens doesn’t negate the unease such actions might evoke in a contemporary reader. The challenge of our time lies in holding space for alternative interpretations without succumbing to righteousness or judgment.

Had this scene unfolded in today’s media-saturated environment, it’s not hard to imagine the outrage. Remember the Royal Spanish Football Federation President Luis Rubiales? He placed an unwanted kiss on the lips of the gold medal winning soccer team’s star. Rubiales faced widespread criticism for the incident, labeling his behavior “unacceptable” and “simply disgusting,” and calls for him to stand trial.

Were Jacob a modern day personality, social media platforms would erupt with criticism, news outlets would amplify competing narratives, and public figures would be compelled to take sides. The progressive left, committed to ideals of justice and consent, might decry Jacob’s actions, interpreting them as emblematic of male entitlement and patriarchal norms. At the same time, others might dismiss the backlash as overreach, defending the kiss as an innocent, even celebratory, act.

These dynamics echo broader societal debates. The terms “cancel culture,” “virtue signaling,” and “political correctness” are often wielded as critiques of progressive efforts to hold individuals accountable. But beneath these monikers lie genuine aspirations for a fairer and more just world. The friction arises when accountability becomes politicized, conversations grow polarized, and elections are at stake.

Fundamentalists and literalists might argue that the Bible implicitly endorses Jacob’s behavior, framing it within the norms of its time. Others may view the tears that followed the kiss as evidence of its spiritual purity—a moment of divine inspiration rather than human transgression. Still, some will find such arguments insufficient, especially when read alongside modern understandings of consent and trauma.

The recent cultural shifts in America reflect these tensions. Progressives, reeling from electoral losses and societal pushback, often find themselves caught between defending their ideals and grappling with accusations of alienating rhetoric. Critics argue that the left’s insistence on moral absolutes has estranged potential allies, while others suggest that the progressive movement’s ethical clarity is precisely its strength.

So, how do we reconcile these perspectives? Perhaps the key lies in embracing complexity. The story of Jacob and Rachel invites us to read beyond the literal, to hold the text’s spiritual richness alongside our contemporary values. It challenges us to ask: Can we engage with our foundational narratives in a way that honors both their historical context and our evolving ethical standards?

America’s recent political landscape offers a similar challenge. Righteousness alone may not win elections but abandoning core principles for the sake of expedience risks undermining the very ideals that define a movement. The balance lies in finding a prophetic voice that is both compelling and accessible, a voice that can inspire without alienating.

Jacob’s kiss at the well, like many biblical moments, resists simple categorization. It is at once a deeply personal act and a symbol of something far greater. By wrestling with its meaning, we not only deepen our understanding of the text but also of ourselves—and the societies we aspire to build.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

Molly Ivins famously observed, “The first rule of holes is, when you’re in one, stop digging.” Thomas Friedman added, “When you’re in three, bring a lot of shovels.” Reflecting on the story of Isaac in Genesis, I’m inclined to think Friedman was channeling the Torah.

Isaac faced adversarial neighbors who sought to undermine his survival. The Philistines stopped up the wells that his father, Abraham, had dug. In a harsh, arid landscape, obstructing a water source isn’t just an inconvenience; it’s an existential threat.

“Isaac dug anew the wells which had been dug in the days of his father Abraham and which the Philistines had stopped up after Abraham’s death, and he gave them the same names that his father had given them.” (Genesis 26:18)

Isaac’s actions were not about innovation but continuity. He wasn’t trying to build something new; he was restoring what had been lost. By redigging the wells, Isaac extended his father’s legacy and sustained his family and community.

In the Torah, wells represent more than just a source of water—they symbolize connection and gathering. Rebecca met Abraham’s servant at a well, Tzipporah encountered Moses at a well, and throughout Jewish tradition, wells are places of critical encounters and shared purpose.

Today, Isaac’s determination to reopen his father’s wells challenges us to reflect on the legacies we want to protect. Many of these legacies are at risk:

The legacy of Jewish comfort in America is being stopped up by rising anti-Semitism.
Doubts about our voting systems are threatening the foundation of our democracy.
Caring communities are dissolving as we retreat into online shopping, social media trolling, and TikTok distraction.

Isaac teaches us that there is a time for innovation and a time for restoration. Reopening the wells of our fathers—those symbolic fonts of civility, freedom, and connection—has never been more vital. Without them, the sources that sustain our society may collapse under the weight of discord, subjugation, and disconnection.

I offer an example.  I have devoted myself to fostering relationships with our African American neighbors in Maryland. Some question the value of these efforts. Alliances between Jewish Americans and other minority groups have frayed. After decades of interfaith work, skeptics point out that some allies have failed to support Jewish Americans in their concerns about Israel and the fight against anti-Semitism. But as I reflect on both the Torah and Tom Friedman’s advice, I believe this is precisely the moment to bring more shovels to the task. Relationships between groups is not a one time dig, but an ongoing process that requires opening and reopening.

Isaac’s story reminds us that progress is not always about creating something new. Sometimes, it’s about preserving and restoring the essential foundations that sustain life and community. In a world increasingly fragmented, reopening these wells of connection and understanding is not just a choice—it’s a necessity.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

 

In the Torah, as Rebekah’s family sends her off to marry Isaac, they offer her a striking blessing. Rather than the typical wishes we might expect for a young bride—health, happiness, and fulfillment—her family’s blessing takes on a surprisingly militaristic tone:

“And they blessed Rebekah and said to her, ‘O sister! May you grow into thousands of myriads; may your descendants seize (יירש) the gates of their foes.’” (Genesis 24:60)

The blessing begins with a wish for Rebekah to have countless descendants, a common and heartfelt hope in biblical times. Yet, this sentiment quickly transforms into something more aggressive: a vision of those descendants prevailing over their enemies and seizing property from within their gates.

Why would Rebekah’s family assume her descendants would have enemies? Her family were shepherds, not warriors. Yet they imagined adversaries living in fortified, gated communities. Perhaps this reflects an ancient prescience—an understanding that the future of Rebekah’s descendants, the Jewish people, would be fraught with conflict. The blessing, then, is both a wish for progeny and a recognition of struggle.

This ancient blessing also seems to reveal a complex, even unsettling, dimension of Jewish identity. The vision of descendants as conquerors may reflect a “shadow side” of the Jewish historical experience. Today, Rebekah’s descendants continue to face adversaries. Some read this blessing as a divine mandate not just to defend against enemies but to seize their territory.

Consider the modern context: Mike Huckabee, a former governor and nominee for U.S. ambassador to Israel, sees a flourishing Israel as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy. Rooted in verses like Rebekah’s blessing, Zionists, both Christian and Jewish, believe Israel should annex more land currently under Palestinian control, fulfilling  the ancient promise for Rebekah’s descendants to “inherit the gates of their foes.”

This interpretation raises profound questions about the interplay between scripture and modern geopolitics. Huckabee’s vision reflects a broader trend among certain Christian Zionists who see the modern state of Israel as central to the second coming of Jesus. However, this view risks turning a poetic blessing into a justification for regional conflict.

The Torah, however, does not give us a one-dimensional message. Verses like Rebekah’s blessing seem to endorse triumph over enemies. However, the Torah also emphasizes the sanctity of life and the pursuit of justice. Deuteronomy reassures Israel that God will protect them from enemies, yet it also records God’s command for Joshua to conquer the land. This tension between defense and conquest runs throughout biblical history.

As we grapple with these ancient texts, we are left with hard questions: How do we balance security with morality? How do we teach our children to value peace in a world where enemies often arise?

For millennia, the Jewish people had no homeland to defend. Since 1948, the modern state of Israel has offered a place of refuge—but also a new set of challenges. How are we, Israel and the Jewish people together, heeding the mixed biblical messages?

Rebekah’s family offered an aggressive vision: to seize the gates of their enemies. Yet, the Torah’s broader message compels us to temper strength with restraint and aggression with justice. The blessing offered to Rebekah is a call to secure the Jewish people and their borders. As Jews, our highest aspiration is to seek peace and uphold the dignity of all people, even amidst conflict.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

 

After a vitriolic election, we should reflect on the issues motivating the electorate. Candidates appealed to voters with positions on economic reforms, immigration policy, and women’s rights. For Jews, I believe the most pressing issue was the sanctity of life. As democracy’s hallmarks guarantee safety for citizens, Jews supported defenders of democracy, would-be protectors of our lives and all human life.

Whenever Jews began to feel a semblance of comfort in a country, we were often jolted back to our foundational concern: the sanctity of life. Our sages advocated that life is sacred. However, the theological origins of that advocacy began in a dialogue between Abraham and God.

In Parshat Vayera, God reveals His intention to destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah due to their pervasive evil. In a striking act of moral advocacy, Abraham argues for their salvation. Abraham understands life is sacred, exercising the democratic right of free speech to challenge God.

Abraham, an unpretentious shepherd, implored God to spare the cities even if there were only ten righteous people. In the face of overwhelming evil, Abraham’s passionate plea illustrated the sanctity of life and the responsibility to protect the innocent. Ten righteous souls were not found, yet Lot’s family was saved. The angels rescued Lot and his family, demonstrating that, even if only for a very few people, saving life is imperative. Just as God holds evil actors accountable, we advocate that innocent persons not be swept away too.

Protecting life reverberates throughout contemporary political discourse. Recognizing that Jewish lives have often been devalued in our history, we stand as witnesses to the importance of protecting life. Accordingly, today’s rabbinic voices echo Abraham’s advocacy, even extending it beyond our community to encompass all humanity. When the world acknowledges the sacredness of all life, Jews will also find safety. This hope underpins our historic commitment to human rights, rooted in the Torah, and reshaped into the framework of democracy.

Democratic values honor individuals as worthy of respect and protection. By championing these values, we transform freedoms from mere legal constructs into moral imperatives. For instance, the right to free speech is a cornerstone of our advocacy. After all, if Abraham could challenge the Almighty, then shouldn’t we have the right to express ourselves freely? Yet, the Torah also teaches that every moral principle has its limits.

The exchange between God and Abraham illustrates competing values can lead to complex moral dilemmas. God brings justice to the world, while Abraham channels temperance to protect the innocent.

Ultimately, all moral values encounter competing ethical considerations. For example, while we cherish free speech, we also condemn incitement to violence.

Today, the Jewish psyche grapples with existential challenges in American politics. Inflammatory rhetoric and incitement to violence threaten to undermine our democratic principles. The current discourse, marked by intimidation and incitement against political opponents, resonates deeply in our historical experience. Jews know that incendiary language can escalate into horrific realities. As we risk being victims to passions untethered to morality, our commitment to democracy must prevail.

To be Jewish in the legacy of Abraham is to advocate for life, to protect the innocent, to empower the vulnerable, and to defend the threatened. Our mission as Jews is to confront those in power just as Abraham did with God. That advocacy must propel the core principles of the Jewish faith: pursuing peace, respecting people, and protecting life. Democratic principles underscoring these Jewish values, began with Abraham’s advocacy.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

This past summer, I attended the dedication ceremony for the cornerstone of the Scotland AME Zion church. Wearing my yarmulke, I participated as a representative of the Jewish community. I was inspired as the bishop of the AME Church delivered a powerful message of unity and hope. After the ceremony, the bishop noticed me and waved me over. His first words were, “I want to bless you, and I want to bless Israel.” This reminded me of a poignant episode in the Torah.

In this episode, Abraham rescues his nephew Lot, who local kings had captured. Upon his victorious return, he is greeted by King Melchizedek. In Genesis Chapter 14, we read, “And King Melchizedek of Salem brought out bread and wine; he was a priest of God Most High. He blessed him, saying, ‘Blessed be Abram of God Most High, Creator of heaven and earth. And blessed be God Most High, who has delivered your foes into your hand.” Melchizedek taught us an important lesson about sharing blessings.

Blessings affirm gratitude and express hope. When paired with the core Jewish value of sustaining community, blessings place an imprimatur on the neighborliness that improves our world.

Looking to the holiness code of Torah, we read the instruction of Leviticus 19:18 to love our neighbor as ourselves. There are no limits to the pool of neighbors we should love. Just as God sent Abraham into a challenging environment, where he defended his family against enemies, Abraham also received blessings from his neighbors. I draw inspiration from Abraham, who was strong against his foes and accommodating toward his neighbors.

In tractate Menachot 43b, the sages teach that we should say no fewer than 100 blessings a day. Yet, a single blessing from a Christian faith leader had as profound an impact on me as a daily offering of traditional Hebrew blessings. Like Melchizedek and the bishop, I learned the value of extending blessings to one another, especially to our neighbors.

Jews often feel less comfortable offering blessings to others, a tradition that is more common in many Christian communities. However, blessings serve to deepen the relationships between us and our neighbors. With this intention, I will eagerly offer more blessings to the people I encounter.

Evan J. Krame

Stories of your childhood might include misadventures and outbursts. Every child acts up or acts out. Learning to respond to life’s challenges fosters our maturity. Frustration, anger, or disbelief will rile us our entire lives. Mature adults learn to control their impetuous or immature reactions. The Torah teaches us to live with maturity, repair, and morality.

The narrative of Genesis presents a complex view of God, revealing a Creator infused with childlike wonder and reactivity. God created the world and declared, “This is good.” Yet, as soon as there is a misadventure, God metes out justice. Because Adam and Eve disobeyed God’s rules, God banished them from paradise.

For a while, God seems pleased enough. Upon observing rampant corruption, God upended the gameboard, sparing Noah, his family, and animal representatives. In restoring order to the world, God set a rainbow in the sky, as a promise never to destroy the earth again.

Examining these stories, I first found a God created in the image of humans. God ventured on a journey of growth, models the maturing process for us. Yet, that is a simple and pediatric view of God framed by human impetuosity.  The mature observer sees design behind a seemingly impulsive source of Creation.

Consider the expulsion from Eden: without it, humanity as we know it might not exist. This event triggered a series of transformations that populated the world.

But what of a God who destroys life, sparing only a select few? If viewed merely as a myth, this story might serve as a cautionary tale about the consequences of corrupt behavior. Alternatively, a dogmatic interpretation could portray a harsh, omnipotent Creator to be feared. Yet the flood narrative offers an instructive, profound theology of mistakes and redemption.

I do not adhere to a literal understanding of the flood; instead, I am drawn to the deeper meaning of moral and emotional evolution. The flood story reminds us that corruption is deserving of consequences. But the Judge, should mete out appropriate punishment. Even the Judge can reconsider the impact of a ruling. God did it.

We can commit to personal growth, cultivate morality, and repair damage we caused, even if in the name of justice or righteousness. That is why God models flawed behavior, not perfect behavior, so that we can know that to emulate God is to be on a path of growth and maturity.

With every storm, there is the promise of a rainbow, symbolizing hope for the future born of the possibility that, like God, we can improve.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame

Our world feels chaotic, marred by evil, and filled with absurdity. In my quest for some wisdom to ground me, I turned to the first chapters of the Torah. The text records the genesis of chaos, evil, and absurdity! And while chaos can be managed and evil can face consequences, absurdity? Well, it’s the bad news that will refuse to leave!

The Torah kicks off with chaos. Everything started with a big mess—what the Hebrew text calls “tohu v’vohu.” But then God stepped in and turned that chaos into a universe. My takeaway is optimism! God tidied up disarray and disorder. From God’s example, inspiration comes to tackle our daily disasters. With civility and justice, perhaps we can even tame the world.

Then the text introduces us to our first couple, Adam and Eve. They disobeyed a clear rule about the Tree of Knowledge. There’s a giant neon sign saying, “Do Not Eat!” and they munched away. While they were banished from paradise, the knowledge they acquired allowed them to have children. We would not exist but for them eating the apple. Without their mistake, none of us would be here today.

Next up: the saga of their sons, Cain and Abel. Abel was tending sheep, and Cain was growing crops. Abel brought the best of his flock as an offering to God, while Cain offered some fruits and vegetables. God preferred Abel’s sacrifice to Cain’s and played favorites as to their choice of protein!

In today’s world, Cain would win the “Health and Sustainability Award” for his plant-based offering. But back then a dejected Cain reacted by killing Abel. If only Cain had had a therapist to talk through his feelings to avert his outrage.

Or perhaps, Cain just needed a good lawyer. Your honor, Cain did not have sufficient intent to be convicted of a crime. After all, how would he know the consequence of hitting his brother? No person had ever died before.

Here’s the twist: All of us are descendants of Cain! So the next time you feel frustrated or angry at the absurdity in this world, remember: you might be channeling your inner Cain!

The Torah suggests that while God can calm chaos and deal with evil, absurdity is here to stay. But here’s the good news: when we face the chaos and evil in our lives, we can transform those challenges into blessings. Maybe one day we’ll figure out how to laugh at the absurdity surrounding us rather than lashing out.

So, let’s hold on to hope, lean into our shared genetic heritage, and embrace the beautifully chaotic journey we’re all on together. And then we’ll tackle the absurdity that crouches at the door.

Rabbi Evan J. Krame